Laserfiche WebLink
RULE 2 PERMITS <br /> Because of the dependence on these areas, and the shrub populations, efforts by Colowyo (as <br /> indicated in the previous portions of Section 2.05) have continued to improve reclamation <br /> techniques. As discussed in this revision,new and significant strides are being taken to re-establish <br /> sagebrush steppe communities as well as grassland areas. Many of these new measures will benefit <br /> not only the large game animal segment of the wildlife community, but also other components <br /> such as sage grouse and sharp-tailed grouse populations that are dependent on sagebrush and other <br /> woody species for forage and cover. <br /> Impacts of Mining Operations on Wildlife Resources Within the Mine Plan Area <br /> Several short term negative impacts to wildlife are to be expected in the permit area. Removal of <br /> vegetation communities and habitats will be the most direct impact, resulting in a reduction of <br /> forage and cover. Non-mobile species will be destroyed in localized areas as vegetation and topsoil <br /> are removed. Mobile species will be temporarily displaced until mined areas are reclaimed. As <br /> the mine progresses, some changes in topography will occur through the removing of vegetation, <br /> rock outcroppings, draws, etc. which form natural shelters. <br /> Disturbance of soils will affect soil profiles, micro-climate, and other soil properties. <br /> The backfilling and grading as required in Section 4.14.2 will assure that topographic features and <br /> drainage patterns will be returned to approximate original contour. <br /> Wildlife species inhabiting the permit area that have the most potential for being affected include <br /> deer,elk,sage grouse,and raptors. However,experience to date has shown that all of these species <br /> have adapted to the presence of the Colowyo operation, resulting in minimal direct impact. Most <br /> of the mitigation measures,protection measures, and habitat improvement techniques are directed <br /> toward this wildlife group. <br /> Range and Wildlife Manalzement Prolzrams <br /> Data collected during pre-mine studies during 1974 - 1976 indicated overuse by cattle, deer, and <br /> elk. A majority of the browse species (serviceberry, oak, snowberry, bitterbrush, sage, <br /> chokecherry)showed overutilization to varying degrees. (It has been evident both past and present <br /> that many of the shrubs are in a decadent condition.) <br /> The results of past poor range management practices and heavy browse use have been a reduction <br /> in growth with less available forage. In addition, species such as oak and serviceberry have grown <br /> taller, with palatable growth being limited to a height which can be reached only by the largest <br /> animals. <br /> As oak and serviceberry have grown taller, large windbreaks have been created. In the winter, <br /> these areas hold the snow, which becomes deep enough to limit all access by deer and elk. Thirty <br /> years of observations on the permit area have shown that winter use of the mountain shrub type by <br /> elk and deer is highly dependent on snow depth and severity of winter weather conditions. The <br /> use of serviceberry has been limited to shrubs near the edges of the stands where less snow buildup <br /> Rule 2 Permits 2.05-30 Revision Date: 10/27/20 <br /> Revision No.: TR-143 <br />