Laserfiche WebLink
Analytical results from the groundwater monitoring conducted in 2020 are provided in <br /> Appendix B. Table B.1 provides a comparison of the DCAL-02 samples to the Dry <br /> Creek Alluvial GWPOC water quality standards established in TR-63. Table B.2 <br /> includes the analytical results for the remaining monitoring wells however a <br /> comparison to water quality standards is not made as these wells are not GWPOC's. <br /> The groundwater quality at Dry Creek Alluvial Well DCAL-02 met all applicable water <br /> quality standards. Results of a Mann-Kendall statistical trend analysis also indicate <br /> that total dissolved solids (TDS) concentration at DCAL-02 remain stable at the 95% <br /> confidence interval. <br /> Predictions for the expected TDS increases to be observed at various monitoring wells <br /> were made in the Probable Hydrologic Consequences (PHC, Tab 17) section of the <br /> SIN Permit Application Package (PAP). The following table outlines these predictions <br /> along with this year's observed value. <br /> Well Predicted TDS (mg/L) This Years TDS (mg/L) <br /> WHAL7-2 1299 1070 <br /> WOV14 4385 3830 <br /> WOV17 4295 4700* <br /> WOV25 - 1720 <br /> WW14 2630 4530* <br /> W W 17 3002 648 <br /> WW25 - 404 <br /> Note <br /> *Indicates value above prediction <br /> In 2020, the TDS at two of the seven wells exceeded the predicted TDS value. Its <br /> important to acknowledge that the TDS predictions were intended to demonstrate <br /> the magnitude of potential average increases in the postmining groundwater <br /> adjacent to the mine pits and were not intended to be compared to a singular <br /> well. This is illustrated through the application of the predicted Wadge <br /> Overburden TDS value (4295 mg/L) to WOV17. The 4295 mg/L value was <br /> calculated by multiplying the predicted 5.5% increase in TDS for this area to the <br /> pre-mine TDS average (4072 mg/L) measured at several Wadge Overburden Wells. <br /> However, the pre-mine average TDS at WOV17 was 8043 mg/L, which was already <br /> Page 8 of 17 <br />