Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />G:\COMMON\Holcim\25510\05 Correspondence\response to DRMS TR 10 review of Na letter\sueker revision 20141118\2014 1119 Response to TR 10 review letter .docx <br /> <br />Mr. Timothy A. Cazier <br />November 19, 2014 <br />Page: <br />4/6 <br />compositional “types” is entering into the MW -7 monitoring well. Trilinear diagrams, <br />also known as Piper diagrams, were developed for select samples that had sufficient <br />data for plotting. As shown in Figure 5, most groundwater samples plotted within the <br />calcium plus magnesium, sulfate [Ca+Mg–SO4] type water field shown in the upper <br />portion of the diamond. However, the MW -7 2008 sample is shifted away from the <br />primary group of samples towards the sodium plus potassium, bicarbonate [Na+K– <br />HCO3] type water while the MW -7 2009 sample is clearly a Na+K–HCO3 type water. <br />These shifts in water composition occurred when depth to groundwater increased. <br />MW -7 is completed within the Codell Sandstone and the underlying Blue Hill Shale. <br />The MW -7 borehole was completed to a total depth of 70 feet below ground surface <br />(ft bgs) with the upper 30 feet in the sandstone and the lower 40 feet in the <br />underlying shale (Figure 6). The borehole was backfilled with silica sand to a depth <br />of 42 ft bgs. The borehole was cased and a slotted screen interval was completed <br />from 17 to 42 feet bgs across both the sandstone and shale bedrock. When the <br />depth to groundwater increases at MW -7, the proportion of groundwater that may be <br />contributed from the shale increases and may result in the observed shifts in <br />groundwater quality with increased depth to groundwater. No other site groundwater <br />monitoring wells intersect the Blue Hill Shale and no other site groundwater <br />monitoring wells exhibit the wide variability in constituent concentrations observed at <br />MW -7. The borehole log is included as Attachment 1 to this letter. <br />2) Literature Data: <br />The DRMS has requested that ARCADIS provide some discussion related to the <br />referenced Report to Congress as to whether or not bio-solids are included in the <br />characterization of CKD at similar cement plants. The basis for this statement is that <br />they indicated sludge samples analyzed for TR-06 suggest the addition of the bio- <br />solids alter the chemistry of that typical for CKD. <br />Response: <br />We are not aware of biosolids being used as an admixture for CKD at other cement <br />plants, and we were not able to obtain any data in that regard. Biosolids were <br />originally used as a dust control measure. However, biosolids have not been used at <br />the Portland facility for at least 10 years and represent a small percentage of the total <br />waste in the facility. As such, it is unlikely that they will have a significant impact on <br />the overall chemistry of the highly leachable constituents, such as potassium, <br />sodium, and chloride present in the CKD and be observed in measurements taken <br />10 years later.