My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2021-04-29_PERMIT FILE - M2021011
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2021011
>
2021-04-29_PERMIT FILE - M2021011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/28/2024 9:41:06 AM
Creation date
5/4/2021 5:16:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2021011
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
4/29/2021
Doc Name
Returned Mail
From
DRMS
To
Perry Neil
Email Name
LJW
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
April 18,2021 <br /> Page 2 <br /> such a decree or agreement. See, e.g., Roaring Fork Club, L.P. v. St.Jude's Co.,36 P.3d 1229(Colo. <br /> 2001). <br /> Moreover, these basic rules of Colorado property law are reinforced in the rules, <br /> regulations and statutes that govern the Mined Land Reclamation Board's and Hinsdale <br /> County's review of Crossfire's permit applications. See, e.g., § 34-32.5-115(4)(e), C.R.S. (2020) <br /> (providing for denial of permit application based on absence of an agreement with "persons <br /> having an interest" in irrigation ditches within 200 feet of affected area), Mined Land <br /> Reclamation Board Regulations for Extraction of Construction Materials,; § 34-32.5-115(4)(d), <br /> C.R.S. (providing for denial of permit application for operations contrary to Colorado law); <br /> Hinsdale County Zoning & Development Regulations, Rule 8.10-9.H (prohibiting special uses <br /> that "cause water pollution" or other "objectionable influences beyond the boundaries of the <br /> property on which such use is located" including, presumably, objectionable hydrologic <br /> effects); Rule 2.5-2.A(1)(a) (requiring that historical agricultural operations be protected within <br /> the Piedra District of Hinsdale County). <br /> Please take notice that our clients hold an easement in the subject irrigation ditch; that <br /> Crossfire does not have our clients' consent to alter the ditch;and that Crossfire's plans to alter <br /> the ditch would impermissibly interfere with our clients' rights as dominant estate holders in <br /> the ditch.In order for Crossfire to execute its mining plans without committing trespass,it must <br /> obtain our clients' express,written consent to alter the ditch or obtain an appropriate judgment <br /> from a Colorado court. Crossfire may not unilaterally construct a road over and culvert the <br /> ditch in the absence of such an agreement or judgment. <br /> Thank you for your attention to this letter. Please feel free to reach out to me to discuss <br /> this matter further if necessary. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> MAYNES,BRADFORD,SHIPPS&SHEFTEL,LLP <br /> Durango Office <br /> /s/ Adam T.Reeves <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.