My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2021-04-29_REPORT - C1981010
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1981010
>
2021-04-29_REPORT - C1981010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/1/2021 2:46:27 PM
Creation date
4/30/2021 6:27:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
4/29/2021
From
DRMS
To
Trapper Mining Inc
Annual Report Year
2019
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Email Name
RAR
JLE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Each pit disrupts the potentiometric surface of confined <br /> aquifers. After reclamation,monitoring data show recovery <br /> S. Restoration of of the potentiometric surface outside of backfilled pits and <br /> ground water CDRMS partial recovery of potentiometric surface inside backfilled <br /> recharge to regulation Comment pits. Spoil springs may reduce groundwater recharge by <br /> approximate pre- 4.05.12(3) diverting groundwater flow to surface flow. However, <br /> mining rate Trapper's expected total aggregate spoil spring discharge of <br /> less than 1 cfs are too small to reduce recharge below the <br /> approximate pre-mining rate. <br /> The Probable Hydrologic Consequences(PHC) section of <br /> Trapper's mining and reclamation permit(Section 4.8.3), <br /> discusses the possibility of a high-TDS plume of coal spoil <br /> leachate forming in the Third White Sandstone <br /> downgradient from the Trapper Mine in Section 29-T6N- <br /> 90W. Such a plume would not be expected to form until <br /> several years,possibly decades,after the pit is reclaimed in <br /> the adjoining Section 32. Compared to pre-mining ground <br /> water conditions, such a plume would have elevated <br /> dissolved solids,which could possibly impair the use of <br /> ground water in the Third White Sandstone. <br /> Spoil leachate could also invade the alluvium in Flume <br /> Gulch by seeping down into the subsurface from spoil <br /> T. Prevention of springs flowing on the land surface in the gulch. <br /> adverse impacts CDRMS <br /> to ground water regulation Comment The Third White Sandstone is monitored in the area of the <br /> systems outside 4.05.11 possible plume in well GP-9, and the alluvium is monitored <br /> the permit area with the Coy well. Monitoring data from both wells indicate <br /> that a plume has not reached these wells. Well GC-2 <br /> completed in the 31d White Sandstone up-gradient of well <br /> GP-9 has shown evidence of the predicted plume with <br /> elevated TDS levels and Sulfate levels that initially <br /> increased over time but have since stabilized and appear to <br /> be decreasing. Other wells down-gradient of spoil backfill <br /> such as well P-8 completed in the Third White Sandstone <br /> and well GD-2 completed in the R aquifer are also showing <br /> signs of elevated TDS/Sulfate likely leaching from <br /> backfilled spoils. TDS Levels in well P-8 appear to have <br /> stabilized after a large increase in 1995 but are remaining <br /> above baseline levels. TDS/Sulfate levels in the alluvial <br /> wells have fluctuated significantly over the years but appear <br /> to be within natural levels according to the report. <br /> Page 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.