My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2021-04-28_REVISION - M2019028
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M2019028
>
2021-04-28_REVISION - M2019028
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2025 5:30:00 AM
Creation date
4/29/2021 6:04:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2019028
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
4/28/2021
Doc Name
Request for Technical Revision
From
J&T Consulting, Inc.
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR1
Email Name
PSH
JLE
AWA
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Fort Morgan Farms,LLC <br /> Delta Reservoir—West Cell Preliminary and East Cell Conceptual Design <br /> April 16,2021 <br /> elevation of 4607 feet is 4,562.15 AF. The design for West Cell is shown in Figure 1 in <br /> Appendix 1. <br /> The inflow spillway is 200 feet long and the outflow spillway is 170 feet long. Restricting the <br /> area available for flow to enter the reservoir causes the velocity and water surface elevation <br /> to rise through the spillway. To address this, fuse plugs were designed at both the inflow and <br /> outflow spillways to collapse when the upstream water surface elevations reach 4607 feet. <br /> The fuse plugs were included to prevent flows from smaller magnitude flood events from <br /> entering the reservoir, but they also provide the additional benefit of adding 355 AF to the <br /> existing storage to provide a total potential of 4,562.15 AF. It is not recommended to store <br /> water at the total potential storage for sustained periods as it may cause stress on the fuse <br /> plugs. During the 1-PAC storm event, the maximum flow through the inflow spillway reaches <br /> about 5500 cfs and 5500 cfs through the outflow spillway. The inflow spillway was designed <br /> to convey sufficient flows so as to not impact the existing floodplain elevation. Hydrographs <br /> of the inflow and outflow spillways are presented in Figure 6 in Appendix 1. <br /> East Cell Design <br /> The East Cell is located immediately east or downstream of the West Cell. It was designed <br /> to capture spill flows from the West Cell, and overflows from the SPR during the 1-PAC flood <br /> and prevent encroachment from smaller magnitude floods (roughly less than 25-year storm) <br /> in SPR. The berms around East Cell were designed to prevent overtopping of the crest <br /> during 1-PAC flood. The East Cell berm was designed to be minimum 30 feet wide at the top <br /> with embankment slopes down each side at 3H:1 V, and the berm top elevation range <br /> between 4606.0 and 4609.0 feet elevation to prevent CLPR channel flows from overtopping <br /> the berm and to allow for flows to enter/exit through the opening on the SPR side of the cell. <br /> The outflow spillway along the southeast of the reservoir has a crest length of approximately <br /> 2,500 feet and is proposed to match existing ground. The maximum storage at the spillway <br /> crest elevation of approximately 4602 feet is 6,441 AF. The design for East Cell is shown in <br /> Figure 2 in Appendix 1. During the 1-PAC storm event, the maximum flow through the <br /> outflow spillway reaches about 4500 cfs. The outflow spillway was designed to convey <br /> sufficient flows so as to not impact the existing floodplain elevation. Hydrograph of the <br /> outflow spillway is presented in Figure 6 in Appendix 1. <br /> Bank Stability Design <br /> Bank stability was evaluated at critical areas located along northwestern face of the storage <br /> area adjacent to the CLPR, the inside bank where flows from CLPR enter the storage area, <br /> and the spillway where flows exit the storage area. The bank stability assessment was <br /> performed using the Hydraulic Toolbox (version 4.4) created by the Federal Highways <br /> Administration (FHWA). To meet stability requirements, riprap was selected to armor critical <br /> areas of the embankment fill along the spillway crests and fill revetment adjacent to the CLPR <br /> and SPR. The riprap will be underlain by a granular filter to prevent the failure of riprap due <br /> to potential for fine particles bleeding through riprap voids. The riprap design was <br /> accomplished using the methods described in Chapter 8 of the Urban Storm Drainage <br /> Criteria Manual (USDCM) Volume 1 (Urban Drainage Flood Control District, 2016). <br /> To transport approximately 5500 cfs, reinforced concrete was selected to line the inside crest <br /> and the embankment of the inflow and outflow spillways for the West Cell. Reinforced <br /> concrete protects the inside embankment of the inflow spillway from the increased velocity <br /> F M F_Tech Memo-20210416.docx <br /> Galloway&Company, Inc. Page 5 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.