My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2021-03-15_REVISION - C1981044 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981044
>
2021-03-15_REVISION - C1981044 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2021 10:03:11 AM
Creation date
3/17/2021 2:01:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981044
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
3/15/2021
Doc Name
Proposed Decision and Findings of Compliance
From
DRMS
To
Moffat County Mining, LLC
Type & Sequence
SL4
Email Name
RAR
JLE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
LS Factor, Hillslove-Length and Gradient <br /> The LS Factor is the slope length factor representing the effect of the slope length on erosion relative to <br /> the slope steepness. This value represents how erodible the particular slope length and steepness is <br /> relative to a 72.6 foot long and 9% steep slope unit plot. These values were unique to each parcel and <br /> were determined using the RUSLE 1.06c application with the inputs of the BR parcel lengths and slope <br /> gradient values. <br /> C Factor, Cover Management <br /> The C Factor represents the effects of plants, soil cover, soil biomass, and soil distributing activities of <br /> erosion. The C factor accounts for all surface cover including non-plant material. Data from the <br /> vegetation report in attachment D was used as inputs with in the RUSLE 1.06c application to determine <br /> the C Factor for each area. <br /> P Factor, Support Practice <br /> The P factor reflects the impact of support practices on the annual average erosion rate. A conservative <br /> value of 1 indicates that there is no consideration for deposition where as a value of 0 indicates that no <br /> sediment left the slope. In this scenario a value of 0.9 is appropriate. <br /> The Division finds MCM's selected RUSLE variables reasonable. MCM's basis for selecting each <br /> variable can be referenced in Appendix G of the Application and the Divisions review of each variable <br /> found MCM's methodology appropriate. <br /> Utah Tract Cover Analysis <br /> Species composition was consistent with the species reported in the application and with the approved <br /> seed mix, with relatively large quantities of. perennial grasses Leymus cinereus (basin wildrye), <br /> Pascopyron smithii (western wheatgrass). The dominant shrubs and perennial forbes comprised <br /> Artemisia tridentate (big sagebrush), Symphoricarpos albus (snowberry),Amelanchier lamarckii <br /> (serviceberry),Festuca saximontana(Rocky Mountain fescue),Astragalus cicer(cicer milkvetch), and <br /> Medicago sativa (Alfalfa). <br /> Noxious C li st weeds such as Bromus tectorum (cheatgrass),Poa bubosa (bulbous bluegrass), and <br /> Cardaria draba(whitetop), a B list species weed Cynoglossum officinale (hound's tongue)were <br /> occasionally observed. These weed species comprise a small set, in both numbers and extent and did <br /> not appear to significantly impact the establishment of the desired vegetation. <br /> Range Site A <br /> Sample adequacy was achieved in both 2014 and 2015. Vegetation data for Range Site A in 2014 showed <br /> a mean allowable first hit cover of 39.4%, and litter cover of 32.7%, exceeding the standard. Vegetation <br /> data for 2015 indicated mean allowable first hit cover of 53.0% and litter cover of 26.9%, exceeding the <br /> Permit Number C1981044 Page 18 of 25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.