My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2021-03-15_REVISION - C1981044 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981044
>
2021-03-15_REVISION - C1981044 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2021 10:03:11 AM
Creation date
3/17/2021 2:01:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981044
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
3/15/2021
Doc Name
Proposed Decision and Findings of Compliance
From
DRMS
To
Moffat County Mining, LLC
Type & Sequence
SL4
Email Name
RAR
JLE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
and graded in accordance with the approved post-mine topography. To evaluate the SL4 bond release <br /> block for Phase I bond release, the Division compared the post mining topography (PMT) as depicted on <br /> Map 2,the Post Mining Topography and Features to the actual on the ground conditions.During the Phase <br /> I field inspection the Division collected data for use in validating the on the ground topography of the <br /> bond release parcels. Map 2 elevations are reflective of the approved PMT map M29 (2020). <br /> Using the ArcMap 10.3.1 application for mapping and analysis, the Division georeferenced the Post <br /> Mining Topography and Features map, Map 2 ("M2"), of the bond release application and in the field <br /> collected elevation points in each parcel to be evaluated with a Bad Elf GNSS(Global Navigation Satellite <br /> System), surveyor. <br /> Using Microsoft Excel® (Table V), the Division charted the Post Mine Topography from the map <br /> elevations, and the on-the-ground measured elevations, converting the elevation field data from meters to <br /> feet. These field collected points were then compared to elevations on the M2 map. The illustrations <br /> below show transect locations, field collected points in relationship to the M2 map exhibiting the elevation <br /> differences between the MCM map and field collected information. <br /> Post Minim Topography Utah Tract: <br /> Utah Tract East West <br /> 7514 <br /> 7499 <br /> c <br /> 7387 7403 <br /> 7343 <br /> 0 7387 7377 <br /> v 7337 <br /> w <br /> 1 2 3 4 <br /> f Elev Measured(Ft) f Elev Map(Ft) <br /> Graph 1: Utah Tract East West Elevation Transect <br /> Permit Number C1981044 Page 14 of 25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.