My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2021-03-10_REVISION - M1987131 (5)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1987131
>
2021-03-10_REVISION - M1987131 (5)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/28/2024 7:36:58 AM
Creation date
3/11/2021 6:15:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1987131
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
3/10/2021
Doc Name
Objection
From
Becky & Steve Andrews
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM3
Email Name
TC1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
In the amendment application, 6.4.8 Exhibit H Wildlife Information: It says "Impacts on <br /> local wildlife are expected to be negligible." We don't believe that's true - but the <br /> impact will be lessened if mining is held back from the river. <br /> There are 7 pages of information about soil. Nearly all the soils have the potential for <br /> rapid to very rapid runoff with a high to very high potential for erosion. Again, the <br /> farther the mining operation is from the river, the less likely it is to impact the river. <br /> We're now wondering if the opaque muddy water that we see during flood events is the <br /> result of mining around Eight Mile Creek. We don't know. In any event, from the <br /> application 6.4.4 Exhibit D Mining Plan c) states that "this operation is not expected to <br /> directly affect surface water....." When looking west from our property to the mining <br /> scar along the river, we believe the first torrential rain is going to create a huge mess in <br /> the river. In this area, mining should not be allowed to continue that close to the banks <br /> of the Arkansa River. <br /> When we built on our land in 2011, we were required to get approval from the Army <br /> Corps of Engineers to move a return irrigation ditch that had created a small wetlands. <br /> The Corps asked us to create a new wetlands that would equal the area of the <br /> wetlands being lost, and we did. It seems to me that Fremont Pavement & Redi Mix <br /> should have the same obligation to protect the Arkansas River Riparian Corridor, <br /> especially after public monies have been spent to restore it. <br /> We acknowledge the needs of the regional population when it comes to road base and <br /> other construction materials produced from the Penrose Pit. We also acknowledge <br /> their right to develop rock extraction product as per their contracts and permits. We <br /> merely ask that development occurs with the least environmental damage to the most <br /> environmentally sensitive public and private land in the vicinity. Specifically, we ask <br /> that Fremont Pavement & Redi Mix not mine on the rectangle of land owned by the <br /> South40 Land Company LLC or the land between that parcel and the Arkansas river. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> Becky and Steve Andrews <br /> 257 CR 119 <br /> Florence, CO 81226 <br /> 719-784-2053 <br /> andrewss@earthlink.net <br /> Enclosed: <br /> Bird List <br /> Maps <br /> USDA Project Description <br /> Notes from the amendment application <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.