Laserfiche WebLink
Lyons Quarry �� <br /> 112d Reclamation Permit Operations <br /> Technical Revision <br /> 19% of the area includes steep slopes that would either be covered by talus riprap or remain open <br /> for nesting birds. The design for Technical Revision#2 is based on recommendations made in the <br /> Kleinfelder Summary Report of Engineering Stability Analysis for Lyons Quarry (dated February <br /> 2008). <br /> Recent discussions with BCPOS have proposed using the property for public recreation purposes as <br /> well. During the adequacy review period for Technical Revision#2, it was the request of BCPOS that <br /> the revised plan's construction approach leave as much natural slope variability to the site as <br /> possible; therefore, keeping the dacite formation exposed for geologic interpretation. Aggregate <br /> Industries and their consultant, HDR Engineering, developed a 30% conceptual design in October <br /> 2020 to present to the BCPOS to meet the following objectives: <br /> • Meet the requests of BCPOS for slope variability and preserve a section of the exposed <br /> dacite walls for biological and geological interpretation purposes, <br /> • Minimize risk to reclamation earthmoving contractors working at the base of the highwall <br /> area during backfill operations, <br /> • Minimize the amount of blasting and material handling required to backfill the northeast <br /> facing slope of the highwall, <br /> • Keep the reclamation operations within the current footprint of the disturbed mining area. <br /> A meeting was held on November 12, 2020 between BCPOS, Aggregate Industries and HDR to <br /> discuss comments and concerns with the revised plan. Many of the questions centered on the <br /> floodplain reclamation areas and were either addressed during the Technical Revision#4 <br /> development or will be addressed during construction activities. Questions about the maintenance of <br /> the reclamation components (rock bolts, catchment berms, etc.)will be addressed during the final <br /> design development. Generally, there was overall consensus that the revised plan was acceptable, <br /> and that the revised grading plan design development should continue. <br /> The revised reclamation plan's construction approach will require the following components: <br /> • Excavation and backfill of earthen material, <br /> • Construction of rockfall catchment areas at the base of the highwalls, <br /> • Scaling and stabilization of the remaining highwall slopes, <br /> • Soil conditioning and revegetation, and <br /> • Installation of stormwater drainage and erosion control infrastructure. <br /> The Site Grading Plan, Attachment B, shows the proposed cut and fill slopes and final grading. <br /> Exhibit F— Reclamation Plan Map, Attachment C, shows the planned reclamation areas and the <br /> types of reclamation proposed in Area 1, based on a slope analysis of the final grading. Section 5.1 <br /> provides more detail of the proposed Reclamation Plan and Scope of Work developed for estimating <br /> the costs for Exhibit L— Reclamation Cost, Attachment D. Unless otherwise noted, unit costs for <br /> Attachment D are based on bid tabulation results from a 2019 contractor bidding opportunity for the <br /> Lyons Quarry Reclamation. Rule 6.5-Geotechnical Stability Exhibit, Attachment E, provides the <br /> basis for the Site Grading Plan based on analysis and recommendations from the Kleinfelder <br /> Summary Report of Engineering Stability Analysis (Attachment E-1) and the Colorado Rockfall <br /> Simulation Program (CRSP) Evaluation Report(Attachment E-2). The Geotechnical Stability Exhibit <br /> limitations include a 3-year limit on the use of the report due to possible changes over time in land <br /> use, site conditions, regulations, or other factors. As stated in Attachment F of Technical Revision <br /> March 2021 1 5 <br />