My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2021-03-05_REVISION - M1977141
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1977141
>
2021-03-05_REVISION - M1977141
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2025 2:17:07 AM
Creation date
3/8/2021 7:18:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977141
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
3/5/2021
Doc Name
Request for Technical Revision
From
Aggregate Industries - WCR, Inc.
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR5
Email Name
AME
MAC
AWA
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
123
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Lyons Quarry �`` <br /> 112d Reclamation Permit Operations 77` <br /> Technical Revision <br /> modeled, although these blocks are deemed highly unlikely to be generated by the quarry slope, <br /> providing a factor of safety. The 30-foot long runout area was selected because it corresponds to the <br /> eastern end of the northeast dacite highwall where the runout area is narrowest but has an opposite- <br /> facing slope at 1H:1V across from the 30-foot runout area. The slope height of 50 feet at this location <br /> provides a factor of safety of over five times the necessary slope height of 9 feet to catch all rock <br /> sizes simulated with a 30-foot runout and an opposite slope of 1 H:1V. The area with the lowest <br /> opposite berm height is the western end of the northeast-facing dacite highwall where the runout <br /> area is 130 feet long and the opposite facing berm is 20 feet high, which is well within the limits of <br /> the evaluation results. An additional factor of safety can be assumed since the critical section is <br /> applied to the entire highwall. <br /> With the catchment basin in Quarry 1 as described above, observation of the northeast-facing dacite <br /> highwall can only be made from a significant distance. An alternative catchment berm alignment is <br /> shown in Figure 6 that would allow closer observation of the dacite highwall. The alternative berm <br /> has been placed 30 feet from the toe of the quarry highwall and should be at least 18 feet high <br /> based on the evaluation results discussed above, and to provide an adequate factor of safety. This <br /> alternative berm was included for consideration on the preliminary design but was not included in the <br /> intermediate or pre-final designs. <br /> A rockfall evaluation was also conducted for the northwest-facing dacite highwall with the critical <br /> Section B shown on Figure 6, to evaluate the necessary height of a catchment berm to be <br /> constructed at the highwall toe. The results of the evaluation indicate that with a runout length of 30 <br /> feet, an 8-foot high berm constructed with 1 H:1V slopes will catch 100%of all rock sizes modeled, <br /> which includes the spherical sandstone blocks up to 12 feet in diameter(which are highly unlikely) <br /> providing a factor of safety. The runout length of 30 feet was selected for evaluation as the <br /> narrowest available area at the western extent of the highwall. Increasing the berm height to 12 feet <br /> will provide a factor of safety of at least 1.5 at the south end where the runout length is shortest and <br /> higher along the remaining alignment where the runout length increases from 30 to 60 feet. <br /> According to the Kleinfelder report; "Rockfall events could also result in a dangerous condition to <br /> structures or people who happen to be located at the base of the slope during a rockfall event. This <br /> potential hazard should be effectively mitigated by adequate limitation of access to areas of potential <br /> rockfall" (Kleinfelder, 2008). Aggregate Industries proposes to install appropriate land use controls, <br /> such as fences and signage, around a buffer zone restricting public access to any areas of potential <br /> rockfall or fall hazards. The alignment of this proposed fencing is shown in Attachment B and Chain <br /> Link Fence specifications for the land use controls have been developed using Mile High Flood <br /> District Technical Specifications. <br /> 3.5 Stormwater and Erosion Control Features <br /> With the proposed changes to the site grading plan, corresponding revisions to the approved <br /> Technical Revision#2 plan for channeling stormwater runoff and controlling erosion will be <br /> necessary. As with the original plan, slopes equal to or less than 2H:1V will be stabilized with <br /> appropriate Best Management Practices (BMP's) including straw wattles and/or silt fencing. Slopes <br /> steeper than 2H:1 V may not be feasible to install BMPs but will be channeled to the rockfall <br /> catchment basin and a secondary earthen berm around the scour berm to capture potentially <br /> suspended sediments. <br /> March 2021 1 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.