My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2020-12-21_PERMIT FILE - C1981010A (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981010
>
2020-12-21_PERMIT FILE - C1981010A (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/25/2021 11:44:12 AM
Creation date
2/25/2021 8:19:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/21/2020
Doc Name
page 4-233s to 4-248b
Section_Exhibit Name
4.8 Hydrologic Impacts Part 3
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4.8.5.2 Ground-Water Monitorinq <br /> Map M52 shows the locations of the ground-water monitoring sites. The current list of ground-water <br /> parameters to be monitored is given in Table 4.8-13. The current ground-water monitoring schedule is <br /> summarized in Table 4.8-13a. Table 4.8-13a was changed in PR-3 (permit term 1993-1997) in order to <br /> accommodate a more clearly understandable and user friendly monitoring schedule format. In Technical <br /> Revision TR-93, the Division and Trapper Mining Inc. agreed that well GP-9 is the point of compliance for <br /> the Basic Standard for Ground Water for the Third White sandstone. In Technical Revision TR-96, the <br /> Division and Trapper Mining Inc. agreed that the Coy well is the point of compliance for the Basic <br /> Standards for Ground Water for the Flume Gulch alluvium. <br /> Three lists of ground-water parameters are sampled as outlined in Table 4.8-13, according to the <br /> schedule presented in Table 4.8-13a. The hydrologic data derived from this monitoring program is <br /> submitted to the Division on an annual basis by March 15 of each year. The first Annual Hydrologic Report <br /> was submitted to the Division in January, 1983. <br /> LIST B in Table 4.8-13 gives the parameters to be sampled on an annual basis during third quarter of <br /> each year. LIST C and LIST D are sampled during the second quarter of each year. LIST C is used to <br /> sample operational wells which monitor the effects of mining in areas not associated with utility wastes <br /> disposal. LIST D is used for wells to monitor the effects of utility wastes disposal. With regard to LIST D, <br /> actual installation of wells in the backfilled pits will be dependent upon whether or not utility wastes are dis- <br /> posed upgradient from the proposed monitoring sites. Proposed wells in the undisturbed aquifers <br /> downgradient of utility wastes disposal sites will be installed as waste disposal progresses and as needed. <br /> List E was used for monitoring the LUX-1 well. List E was removed from Table 4.8-13 in PR-6 because <br /> the LUX-1 well was sealed and abandoned in 2006 as a result of the approval of final bond release <br /> application SL-7. <br /> Historical information on well completion information and lithologic logs for monitoring wells are included in <br /> various sections of the permit application. Appendix H, Radian Report Tech. Note 280-311-02-03 lists <br /> information for monitoring well series GF, GBB, and GZ. Section 2.7.7.3 (p 2-539) of the permit <br /> application provides information on lithologic logs for monitoring wells F-1, F-2, P-1, P-3, P-5, and P-8. A <br /> well construction diagram is provided in Appendix V. Appendix V also provides lithologic logs and <br /> monitoring well completion information for wells GA-1, GA-2, GB-1, GB-2, GB-5, GC-1, GC-3, GE-1, <br /> GE-2, GE-3, GD-1, GD-1(2), GLEV-1, GLEV-2, GLEV-3, CY-A, CY-1, CY-2, CY-3 and Empire Well <br /> 81-03A. <br /> Mercury, silver and zinc are not included in LIST B because their concentrations in historic samples were <br /> very low and because it is unlikely they would occur in significant concentrations in any potential leachate <br /> from utility wastes (refer to Section 4.3.4.6). Iron was removed from List C as the definition of variations in <br /> iron concentrations is not very useful since the range in this parameter has been defined. TDS was added <br /> to List C until a good correlation between TDS and conductivity can be established. Carbonate was added <br /> to list B and is used for situations when the pH is greater than 8.3. <br /> 4-242 <br /> Revision: TR-126 <br /> Approved: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.