My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2021-02-12_REVISION - M1986015
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1986015
>
2021-02-12_REVISION - M1986015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/28/2024 6:48:59 AM
Creation date
2/17/2021 6:15:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1986015
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
2/12/2021
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response
From
Castle Aggregate
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM5
Email Name
JPL
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 � <br /> ➢ Response: <br /> ✓ Items which will be removed from the current mine site as part of the <br /> construction of the Reservoir Project are not shown on the map but are listed <br /> in a table along the side of the map, along with an estimated date of removal. <br /> ✓ We request these structures (relic equipment) should not be included in the <br /> bond calculation. If they are not removed by the estimated removal date, we <br /> will provide the DRMS a revision/rider to the bond documents to cover their <br /> removal. <br /> ✓ We will provide the DRMS a list of items disposed in the Phase 7 pit. <br /> ✓ Note: Processing plant conveyors and equipment have been substantially <br /> removed prior to this application. <br /> • In conjunction with Exhibit I-Soils Information, Rule 6.4.9, soils information may <br /> be presented on a map in this section. <br /> ➢ Response: <br /> ✓ We respectfully request information on the affected area soils be waived. No <br /> additional areas will be affected. Any soils which were on the site have been <br /> removed. This information is available in Amendment 4. <br /> • 6. It appears that the operator may have provided some of these details in maps E- <br /> 01 through E-04 but the maps do not meet all the requirements of Rule 6.2.1(2) and <br /> the Division could not determine where these maps are referenced in the amendment <br /> application. <br /> ➢ Response: <br /> ✓ We have revised the Maps E-01 through E-04 to include the information <br /> required by Rule 6.2.1(2). In addition, there is some requested information <br /> we request the DRMS waive given the nature of the site, i.e., soils, wildlife <br /> and vegetation, as discussed in this document. <br /> ✓ Please refer to Maps B-land C-1 <br /> 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.