2021-02-04_HYDROLOGY - M2004013

• Permit No: M2004013
• IBM Index Class Name: Hydrology
• Doc Date: 2/4/2021
• Doc Name: Substitute Water Supply Plan
• From: DWR
• To: DRMS
• Email Name: JPL
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

Table 1 B
Estimated Evaporation and Operational Losses for Years 2021 And 2022
St.Barbara Sand and Gravel Mine Under Scenario B(No Mining in 2021,Mining in 2022 without Slurry Wall Construction)
Net Total PBW W
Percent of Evaporation Evaporation Credit/ Replacements
Annual Exposed For Potential Potential Total And Depletion From To Arkansas
Gross Gross Normal Effective Net Net Water Surface Exposed Water Potential Sand Production Dust Dust Operational Operational Dewatering/ Total Lagged River Including
Evaporation Evaporation Precipitation Precipitation Evaporation Evaporation Areas Surface Areas Amount Water Loss Suppression Suppression Water Losses Water Losses Refilling Depletions 1%Transit
Year Month percent inches inches inches inches feet acres acre-feet tons acre-feet (gallons) acre-feet acre-feet acre-feet acre-feet acre-feet acre-feet
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17)
Jan 3.0 1.50 0.32 0.22 1.28 0.11 9.76 1.07 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 1.07 0.00 -2.08 2.10
Feb 3.5 1.75 0.31 0.22 1.53 0.13 9.76 1.27 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 1.27 0.00 -1.94 1.96
Mar 5.5 2.75 0.78 0.55 2.20 0.18 9.76 1.76 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 1.76 0.00 -1.96 1.98
Apr 9.0 4.50 0.88 0.62 3.88 0.32 9.76 3.12 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 3.12 0.00 -2.23 2.25
May 12.0 6.00 1.25 0.88 5.12 0.43 9.76 4.20 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 4.20 0.00 -2.75 2.78
2021 Jun 14.5 7.25 1.25 0.88 6.37 0.53 9.76 5.17 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 5.17 0.00 -3.32 3.35
Jul 15.0 7.50 2.09 1.46 6.04 0.50 9.76 4.88 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 4.88 0.00 -3.73 3.77
Aug 13.5 6.75 1.99 1.39 5.36 0.45 9.76 4.39 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 4.39 0.00 -3.82 3.86
Sep 10.0 5.00 0.90 0.63 4.37 0.36 9.76 3.51 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 3.51 0.00 -3.67 3.71
Oct 7.0 3.50 0.57 0.40 3.10 0.26 9.76 2.54 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 2.54 0.00 -3.33 3.36
Nov 4.0 2.00 0.43 0.30 1.70 0.14 9.76 1.37 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 1.37 0.00 -2.84 2.87
Dec 3.0 1.50 0.42 0.29 1.21 0.10 9.76 0.98 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.98 0.00 -2.35 2.37
1 T _ 1 7:4. 42::? _ 4 .t1 t fat t t ? fl,?0 9 6 � 3t 26 + (?.11 t� ?t?t 0£ 3.; f? 3 r,
Jan 3.0 1.50 0.32 0.22 1.28 0.11 9.76 1.07 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 1.07 0.00 -2.05 2.07
Feb 3.5 1.75 0.31 0.22 1.53 0.13 9.76 1.27 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 1.27 0.00 -1.94 1.96
Mar 5.5 2.75 0.78 0.55 2.20 0.18 4.57 0.82 35,000 1.03 90,000 0.28 1.31 2.13 10.38 0.00 0.00
Apr 9.0 4.50 0.88 0.62 3.88 0.32 4.57 1.46 35,000 1.03 90,000 0.28 1.31 2.77 0.00 -2.29 2.31
May 12.0 6.00 1.25 0.88 5.12 0.43 4.57 1.97 35,000 1.03 90,000 0.28 1.31 3.28 0.00 -2.58 2.61
2022 Jun 14.5 7.25 1.25 0.88 6.37 0.53 4.57 2.42 35,000 1.03 90,000 0.28 1.31 3.73 0.00 -2.87 2.90
Jul 15.0 7.50 2.09 1.46 6.04 0.50 4.57 2.29 35,000 1.03 90,000 0.28 1.31 3.60 0.00 -3.07 3.10
Aug 13.5 6.75 1.99 1.39 5.36 0.45 4.57 2.06 35,000 1.03 90,000 0.28 1.31 3.37 0.00 -3.12 3.15
Sep 10.0 5.00 0.90 0.63 4.37 0.36 9.76 3.51 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 3.51 -10.38 -4.67 4.72
Oct 7.0 3.50 0.57 0.40 3.10 0.26 9.76 2.54 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 2.54 0.00 -5.71 5.77
Nov 4.0 2.00 0.43 0.30 1.70 0.14 9.76 1.37 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 1.37 0.00 -3.86 3.90
Dec 3.0 1.50 0.42 0.29 1.21 0.10 9.76 0.98 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.98 0.00 -2.90 2.93
2 2 ' 1;1 7. 4 42.1 =: _ 1:7 21 ':1 4 1, 7. 2°.2 41
Q..sofat t1.t?fl 3 6 3 tit? 8 8 .3 + tit? tt 3
Notes:
(1)From SEO 05/11/99 for elevations under 6,500 feet
(2)Percent of annual gross evaporation multiplied by 50-inches
(3)Average precipitation from NOAA Climate Station Pueblo Memorial Airport(ID:6740)
(4)col(3)x 70%
(5)col(2)-col(4)
(6)col(5)/12 inches per 1 foot
(7)Based on estimates from operator
(8)col(7)x col(6)
(9)Based on estimates from operator
(10)Water Loss=(Production,col 9)*2000 Ibs/ton*(4%)/((62.4 Ibs/cu ft)/43560 cu ft/acre-foot)
(11)Based on estimates from operator
(12)Conversion to acre-feet.(1 acre-foot=325,851 gallons)
(13)col(10)+col(12)
(14)Total Losses=col(8)+col(13)
(15)Based on 2 ft fill depth(Credit is obtained instantaneously when pit is dewatered.The depletion caused by refilling is lagged to the Arkansas River as if it were an evaporation or operational loss).
(16)Based on Stream Depleton Model
(17)Col(16)+1%transit loss