Laserfiche WebLink
Case 1 20-bk-12043 Doc 573 Filed O1/13/21 Entered 011131211103 53 Desc Main <br />Document Page 33 of 44 <br />Case 1 20-bk-12043 Doc 573 Filed 01/13/21 Entered 01/1312111,03.53 Desc Main <br />Document Page 34 of 44 <br />forbidden by law Therefore, the good faith requirement of section I I29(a)(3) of the Bankruptcy <br />Code has been satisfied <br />D. Payments for Services and Expenses (Section 1129(a)(4)) <br />Section 1129(a)(4) ofthe Bankruptcy Code requires that <br />Any payment made or to be made by the proponent, by the debtor, or by a <br />person issuing securities or acquiring property under the plan, for services <br />or for costs and expenses in or in connection with the case, or in connection <br />with the plan and incident to the case, has been approved by, or is subject <br />to the approval of, the court as reasonable <br />11 U S C § I129(a)(4) In essence, this subsection requires that any and all fees promised or <br />received in connection with or in contemplation of a chapter 11 case must be disclosed and <br />approved, or subject to approval, by the court In re Eagle-Picher Indus, Inc , 203 B R 256, 274 <br />(Banta S D Ohio 1996) <br />Article III of the Plan establishes the mechanism for the payment of varmus Professional <br />Fee Claims, but the fees are subject to Bankruptcy Court approval based on the standards described <br />in the Bankmptcy Code Accordingly, the provisions of the Plan comply with section 1129(a)(4) <br />ofthe Bankruptcy Code <br />E. Identification of Directors, Officers and Insiders (Section 1129(a)(51) <br />Section 1129(a)(5)(A) requires the proponent of any plan to disclose the "identity and <br />affiliations of any mdn idual proposed to serve, after confirmation ofthe plan, as a director, officer, <br />or voting trustee ofthe debtor, an affiliate ofthe debtor participating in ajomt plan with the debtor, <br />or a successor to the debtor under the plan," and requires a finding that "the appointment to, or <br />continuance in, such office of such individual, is consistent with the interests of creditors and <br />equity security holders and with public policy." I U S C § 1129(a)(5)(A)(i)-(n) Additionally, <br />section 1129(a)(5)(B) requires the proponent of a plan to disclose the "identity of any insider that <br />RS7 <br />Case 1 20-bk-12043 Doc 573 Filed 01/13/21 Entered 01/13/2111 03 53 Desc Main <br />Document Page 35 of 44 <br />retain ifthe debtor was liquidated under chapter 7 ofthe Bankruptcy Code I1 U S C § 1129(a)(7) <br />If a class of claims or interests unanimously approves the plan, the best interests test is deemed <br />satisfied for all members of that class In re Drexel Burnham Lambert Grp, Inc, 138 B R 723, <br />761 (Bank¢ S D N Y 1992) <br />Under the Plan, five classes are impaired (Class 1 Priority Claims, Class 3 DIP Claims, <br />Class 4 Prepetition Lender Claims, Class 5 General Unsecured Claims and Class 6 Equity <br />Interests) The test, therefore, requires that each holder of a Claret or Equity Interest in those <br />Classes either accept the Plan or receive or retain under the Plan property having a present value, <br />as ofthe Effective Date ofthe Plan, of no less than the amount that such holder would receive or <br />retain if the Debtors were liquidated under chapter 7. <br />The Proponents have satisfied section 1129(a)(7) with respect to all Classes With respect <br />to the holders of Claims (or Equity Interests, as applicable) in Classes 1, 5, and 6, such holders <br />will receive a recovery of no less than the amount that they would receive if these cases were <br />converted under chapter 7 ofthe Bankruptcy Code <br />First, in a chapter 7 liquidation, the Estates would lose the additional $100,000 payable <br />under the Released Party Order That amount is only payable upon confirmation of the Plan, <br />including the exculpation and release provisions discussed above <br />Second, conversion to a chapter 7 would generate additional Administrative Claims and <br />costs related to the chapter 7 liquidation The chapter 7 trustee's professionals, including its legal <br />counsel and accountants, would add administrative expenses that would be entitled to be paid <br />ahead of Allowed Claims The Estates would also be obligated to pay all unpaid expenses incurred <br />by the Debtors and the Committee during these Chapter I Cases (such as compensation for <br />'S-- 1129(a)(7) a mapphnhk to Clasas 3 end 4 because 100'. of Holders w those Classes eoted in favor of the <br />Plan <br />35 <br />will be employed or remand by the reorganized debtor, and the nature of any compensation for <br />such insider" 11 U S C § I I29(a)(5)(B) <br />In these cases, however, the Plan contemplates the liquidation of the Debtors and no <br />directors or officers will be appointed Because the Plan contemplates the winding down of the <br />Debtors' affairs, § 1129(a)(5) of the Bankruptcy Code, which requires the Proponents to disclose <br />certain information about its post -confirmation officers and directors, is not relevant to <br />confirmation of the Plan See In re Sentinel Management Group, Inc , 398 B R 281 (Bankr N D <br />Bl 2008) (finding that Section 1129(a)(5) does not apply to a post -confirmation liquidating trust) <br />The Proponents have, however, filed a nonce that GlzssRatner Advisory & Capital Group, LLC <br />d/b/a B Riley Advisory Services will serve as the Liquidating Trustee See Liquidating Trustee <br />Notice <br />F. Rate Chanees (Section 1129(a)(6)) <br />Section I I29(a)(6) of the Bankruptcy Code requires that any regulatory commission having <br />jurisdiction over the rates charged by the reorganized debtor in the operation of its business <br />approve any rate change under the plan The Proponents submit that section 1129(a)(6) of the <br />Bankmptcy Code is inapplicable to the Plan because the Plan does not provide for any rate changes <br />subject to the junsdiction of any governmental regulatory commission <br />G. The "Best Interests" Test (Section 1129(a)(7)) <br />Section 1129(a)(7) ofthe Bankruptcy Code requires that a plan be in the best interests of <br />creditors and equity bolders This "best interests" test focuses on individual dissenting creditors <br />rather than classes of -claims See Bank ofAm Nat'l Trust & Sav Assn v 203 N LaSalle St P',hip, <br />526 U S 434. 441 n 13 (1999) The best interests test requires that each holder of a claim or equity <br />interest either accept the plan or receive or retain under the plan property having a present value, <br />as ofthe effective date ofthe plan, which is not less than the amount such holder would receive or <br />34 <br />Case 1 20-bk-12043 Doc 573 Filed O1/13/21 Entered 01/13/21 11 03 53 Desc Main <br />Document Page 36 of 44 <br />Professionals) before payments could be made to holders of unsecured claims In addition, the <br />Cash to be distributed to holders of Claims would be reduced by the chapter 7 trustee's statutory <br />fee, which is calculated on a sliding scale where the maximum compensation is determmed based <br />on the total amount of monies disbursed or turned over by the chapter 7 trustee The Debtors <br />already expect to have well over $1 million on hand as of the Effective Date —and may have <br />several million more after the conclusion of all litigation —resulting in a fee to the chapter 7 tmstee <br />that could be several hundred thousand dollars <br />Third, it is likely that distnbuhons from a chapter 7 estate would be significantly delayed <br />As a result, the present value of such dismbutiom is likely to be materially lower than if made <br />under the Plan Therefore, under a chapter 7 liquidation, holders of Allowed Claims would receive <br />significantly less than they would receive under the Plan <br />H. Acceptance by Impaired Classes fSection 1129(a)(8)) <br />Section I I29(a)(8) of the Bankruptcy Code requires that each class of claims and equity <br />interests either has accepted a chapter 11 plan or is not impaired under a chapter 11 plan 11 U S C <br />§ 1129(a)(8) Class 6 — Equity Interests — were deemed to reject the Plan under section 1126(g) <br />because they are not entitled to receive or retain any property under the Plan Even though Class <br />6 is deemed to reject the Plan, the Plan is confineable because it satisfies section 1129(b), i s further <br />discussed below <br />1. Treatment of Priority Claims (Section 1129(a)(9)) <br />Section I I29(a)(9) ofthe Bankruptcy Code requires full payment of allowed administrative <br />expense claims and payment over time of allowed priority claims, consistent with Section 507 of <br />the Bankruptcy Code As set forth in Article 111, Section 3 02(a) of the Plan, the Debtors or the <br />Liquidating Tmstee, as applicable, will pay all Allowed Administrative Claims to cash in full on <br />the latter of (i) the Effective Date if due on or before that date and unpaid on the Effective Date, <br />36 <br />