Case 1 20-bk-12043 Doc 573 Filed O1/13/21 Entered 011131211103 53 Desc Main
<br />Document Page 33 of 44
<br />Case 1 20-bk-12043 Doc 573 Filed 01/13/21 Entered 01/1312111,03.53 Desc Main
<br />Document Page 34 of 44
<br />forbidden by law Therefore, the good faith requirement of section I I29(a)(3) of the Bankruptcy
<br />Code has been satisfied
<br />D. Payments for Services and Expenses (Section 1129(a)(4))
<br />Section 1129(a)(4) ofthe Bankruptcy Code requires that
<br />Any payment made or to be made by the proponent, by the debtor, or by a
<br />person issuing securities or acquiring property under the plan, for services
<br />or for costs and expenses in or in connection with the case, or in connection
<br />with the plan and incident to the case, has been approved by, or is subject
<br />to the approval of, the court as reasonable
<br />11 U S C § I129(a)(4) In essence, this subsection requires that any and all fees promised or
<br />received in connection with or in contemplation of a chapter 11 case must be disclosed and
<br />approved, or subject to approval, by the court In re Eagle-Picher Indus, Inc , 203 B R 256, 274
<br />(Banta S D Ohio 1996)
<br />Article III of the Plan establishes the mechanism for the payment of varmus Professional
<br />Fee Claims, but the fees are subject to Bankruptcy Court approval based on the standards described
<br />in the Bankmptcy Code Accordingly, the provisions of the Plan comply with section 1129(a)(4)
<br />ofthe Bankruptcy Code
<br />E. Identification of Directors, Officers and Insiders (Section 1129(a)(51)
<br />Section 1129(a)(5)(A) requires the proponent of any plan to disclose the "identity and
<br />affiliations of any mdn idual proposed to serve, after confirmation ofthe plan, as a director, officer,
<br />or voting trustee ofthe debtor, an affiliate ofthe debtor participating in ajomt plan with the debtor,
<br />or a successor to the debtor under the plan," and requires a finding that "the appointment to, or
<br />continuance in, such office of such individual, is consistent with the interests of creditors and
<br />equity security holders and with public policy." I U S C § 1129(a)(5)(A)(i)-(n) Additionally,
<br />section 1129(a)(5)(B) requires the proponent of a plan to disclose the "identity of any insider that
<br />RS7
<br />Case 1 20-bk-12043 Doc 573 Filed 01/13/21 Entered 01/13/2111 03 53 Desc Main
<br />Document Page 35 of 44
<br />retain ifthe debtor was liquidated under chapter 7 ofthe Bankruptcy Code I1 U S C § 1129(a)(7)
<br />If a class of claims or interests unanimously approves the plan, the best interests test is deemed
<br />satisfied for all members of that class In re Drexel Burnham Lambert Grp, Inc, 138 B R 723,
<br />761 (Bank¢ S D N Y 1992)
<br />Under the Plan, five classes are impaired (Class 1 Priority Claims, Class 3 DIP Claims,
<br />Class 4 Prepetition Lender Claims, Class 5 General Unsecured Claims and Class 6 Equity
<br />Interests) The test, therefore, requires that each holder of a Claret or Equity Interest in those
<br />Classes either accept the Plan or receive or retain under the Plan property having a present value,
<br />as ofthe Effective Date ofthe Plan, of no less than the amount that such holder would receive or
<br />retain if the Debtors were liquidated under chapter 7.
<br />The Proponents have satisfied section 1129(a)(7) with respect to all Classes With respect
<br />to the holders of Claims (or Equity Interests, as applicable) in Classes 1, 5, and 6, such holders
<br />will receive a recovery of no less than the amount that they would receive if these cases were
<br />converted under chapter 7 ofthe Bankruptcy Code
<br />First, in a chapter 7 liquidation, the Estates would lose the additional $100,000 payable
<br />under the Released Party Order That amount is only payable upon confirmation of the Plan,
<br />including the exculpation and release provisions discussed above
<br />Second, conversion to a chapter 7 would generate additional Administrative Claims and
<br />costs related to the chapter 7 liquidation The chapter 7 trustee's professionals, including its legal
<br />counsel and accountants, would add administrative expenses that would be entitled to be paid
<br />ahead of Allowed Claims The Estates would also be obligated to pay all unpaid expenses incurred
<br />by the Debtors and the Committee during these Chapter I Cases (such as compensation for
<br />'S-- 1129(a)(7) a mapphnhk to Clasas 3 end 4 because 100'. of Holders w those Classes eoted in favor of the
<br />Plan
<br />35
<br />will be employed or remand by the reorganized debtor, and the nature of any compensation for
<br />such insider" 11 U S C § I I29(a)(5)(B)
<br />In these cases, however, the Plan contemplates the liquidation of the Debtors and no
<br />directors or officers will be appointed Because the Plan contemplates the winding down of the
<br />Debtors' affairs, § 1129(a)(5) of the Bankruptcy Code, which requires the Proponents to disclose
<br />certain information about its post -confirmation officers and directors, is not relevant to
<br />confirmation of the Plan See In re Sentinel Management Group, Inc , 398 B R 281 (Bankr N D
<br />Bl 2008) (finding that Section 1129(a)(5) does not apply to a post -confirmation liquidating trust)
<br />The Proponents have, however, filed a nonce that GlzssRatner Advisory & Capital Group, LLC
<br />d/b/a B Riley Advisory Services will serve as the Liquidating Trustee See Liquidating Trustee
<br />Notice
<br />F. Rate Chanees (Section 1129(a)(6))
<br />Section I I29(a)(6) of the Bankruptcy Code requires that any regulatory commission having
<br />jurisdiction over the rates charged by the reorganized debtor in the operation of its business
<br />approve any rate change under the plan The Proponents submit that section 1129(a)(6) of the
<br />Bankmptcy Code is inapplicable to the Plan because the Plan does not provide for any rate changes
<br />subject to the junsdiction of any governmental regulatory commission
<br />G. The "Best Interests" Test (Section 1129(a)(7))
<br />Section 1129(a)(7) ofthe Bankruptcy Code requires that a plan be in the best interests of
<br />creditors and equity bolders This "best interests" test focuses on individual dissenting creditors
<br />rather than classes of -claims See Bank ofAm Nat'l Trust & Sav Assn v 203 N LaSalle St P',hip,
<br />526 U S 434. 441 n 13 (1999) The best interests test requires that each holder of a claim or equity
<br />interest either accept the plan or receive or retain under the plan property having a present value,
<br />as ofthe effective date ofthe plan, which is not less than the amount such holder would receive or
<br />34
<br />Case 1 20-bk-12043 Doc 573 Filed O1/13/21 Entered 01/13/21 11 03 53 Desc Main
<br />Document Page 36 of 44
<br />Professionals) before payments could be made to holders of unsecured claims In addition, the
<br />Cash to be distributed to holders of Claims would be reduced by the chapter 7 trustee's statutory
<br />fee, which is calculated on a sliding scale where the maximum compensation is determmed based
<br />on the total amount of monies disbursed or turned over by the chapter 7 trustee The Debtors
<br />already expect to have well over $1 million on hand as of the Effective Date —and may have
<br />several million more after the conclusion of all litigation —resulting in a fee to the chapter 7 tmstee
<br />that could be several hundred thousand dollars
<br />Third, it is likely that distnbuhons from a chapter 7 estate would be significantly delayed
<br />As a result, the present value of such dismbutiom is likely to be materially lower than if made
<br />under the Plan Therefore, under a chapter 7 liquidation, holders of Allowed Claims would receive
<br />significantly less than they would receive under the Plan
<br />H. Acceptance by Impaired Classes fSection 1129(a)(8))
<br />Section I I29(a)(8) of the Bankruptcy Code requires that each class of claims and equity
<br />interests either has accepted a chapter 11 plan or is not impaired under a chapter 11 plan 11 U S C
<br />§ 1129(a)(8) Class 6 — Equity Interests — were deemed to reject the Plan under section 1126(g)
<br />because they are not entitled to receive or retain any property under the Plan Even though Class
<br />6 is deemed to reject the Plan, the Plan is confineable because it satisfies section 1129(b), i s further
<br />discussed below
<br />1. Treatment of Priority Claims (Section 1129(a)(9))
<br />Section I I29(a)(9) ofthe Bankruptcy Code requires full payment of allowed administrative
<br />expense claims and payment over time of allowed priority claims, consistent with Section 507 of
<br />the Bankruptcy Code As set forth in Article 111, Section 3 02(a) of the Plan, the Debtors or the
<br />Liquidating Tmstee, as applicable, will pay all Allowed Administrative Claims to cash in full on
<br />the latter of (i) the Effective Date if due on or before that date and unpaid on the Effective Date,
<br />36
<br />
|