|
Case 120-bk-12043 Doc 573 Filed 01/13/21 Entered 01/13/21 110353 Desc Main Case 120-bk-12043 Doc 573 Filed 01/13/21 Entered 01/13/21 110353 Desc Main
<br />Document Page 33 of 44 Document Page 34 of 44
<br />forbidden by law. Therefore, the good faith requirement of section 1129(a)(3) ofthe Bankruptcy
<br />Code has been satisfied.
<br />D. Pavments for Services and Expenses (Section 1129(a)(4))
<br />Section 1129(a)(4) of the Bankruptcy Code requires that
<br />Any payment made or to be made by the proponent, by the debtor, or by a
<br />person issuing securities or acquiring property under the plan, for services
<br />or for costs and expenses in or in connection with the case, or in connection
<br />with the plan and incident to the case, has been approved by, or is subject
<br />to the approval of, the court as reasonable.
<br />11 U.S.C. § 1129(a)(4). In essence, this subsection requires that any and all fees promised or
<br />received in connection with or in contemplation of a chapter 11 case must be disclosed and
<br />approved, or subject to approval, by the court. In re Eagle-Picher Ind s., Inc., 203 B.R. 256, 274
<br />(Bankr. S.D. Ohio 1996).
<br />Article III ofthe Plan establishes the mechanism for the payment of various Professional
<br />Fee Claims, but the fees are subj ectto Bank uptcy Court approval based on the standards described
<br />in the Bankruptcy Code. Accordingly, the provisions ofthe Plan comply with section 1129(a)(4)
<br />of the Bankruptcy Code.
<br />E. Identification of Directors, Officers and Insiders (Section 1129(a)(5))
<br />Section 1129(a)(5)(A) requires the proponent of any plan to disclose the "identity and
<br />affiliations of any individual proposed to serve, after confirmation of the plan, as a director, officer,
<br />or voting trustee ofthe debtor, an affiliate ofthe debtor participating in a joint plan with the debtor,
<br />or a successor to the debtor under the plan," and requires a finding that "the appointment to, or
<br />continuance in, such office of such individual, is consistent with the interests of creditors and
<br />equity security holders and with public policy." 11 U.S.C. § 1129(a)(5)(A)O-(n). Additionally,
<br />section 1129(a)(5)(B) requires the proponent of a plan to disclose the "identity of any insider that
<br />W
<br />will be employed or retained by the reorganized debtor, and the nature of any compensation for
<br />such insider." 11 U.S.C. § 1129(a)(5)(B).
<br />In these cases, however, the Plan contemplates the liquidation of the Debtors and no
<br />directors or officers will be appointed. Because the Plan contemplates the winding down of the
<br />Debtors' affairs, § 1129(a)(5) of the Bankruptcy Code, which requires the Proponents to disclose
<br />certain information about its post -confirmation officers and directors, is not relevant to
<br />confirmation ofthe Plan. See In re Sentinel Management Group, Inc., 398 B.R. 281 (Banta. N.D.
<br />Ill. 2008) (finding that Section 1129(a)(5) does not apply to a post -confirmation liquidating trust).
<br />The Proponents have, however, filed a notice that GlassRatner Advisory & Capital Group, LLC
<br />d/b/a B. Riley Advisory Services will serve as the Liquidating Trustee. See Liquidating Trustee
<br />Notice.
<br />F. Rate Chanties (Section 1129(a)(6))
<br />Section 1129(a)(6) ofthe Bankruptcy Code requires that any regotatory commission having
<br />jurisdiction over the rates charged by the reorganized debtor in the operation of its business
<br />approve any rate change under the plan. The Proponents submit that section 1129(a)(6) of the
<br />Bankruptcy Code is inapplicable to the Plan because the Plan does notprovide for any rate changes
<br />subject to the jurisdiction of any governmental regulatory commission.
<br />G. The "Best Interests" Test (Section 1129(a)(7))
<br />Section 1129(a)(7) of the Bankruptcy Code requires that a plan be in the best interests of
<br />creditors and equity holders. This "best interests" test focuses on individual dissenting creditors
<br />rather than classes of claims. See Bank ofAm. Nat? Trust & Say. Assn v. 203 N LaSalle St. P'ship,
<br />526 U.S. 434, 441 n.13 (1999). The best interests test requires that each holder of a claim or equity
<br />interest either accept the plan or receive or retain under the plan property having a present value,
<br />as of the effective date of the plan, which is not less than the amount such holder would receive or
<br />34
<br />Case 120-bk-12043 Doc 573 Filed 01/13/21 Entered 01/13/21 110353 Desc Main Case 120-bk-12043 Doc 573 Filed 01/13/21 Entered 01/13/21 110353 Desc Main
<br />Document Page 35 of 44 Document Page 36 of 44
<br />retain if the debtor was liquidated under chapter 7 ofthe Bankruptcy Code. 11 U.S.C. § 1129(a)(7).
<br />If a class of claims or interests unanimously approves the plan, the best interests test is deemed
<br />satisfied for all members of that class. In re Drexel Burnham Lambert Grp., Inc., 138 B.R. 723,
<br />761 (Banks. S.D.N.Y. 1992).
<br />Under the Plan, five classes are impaired (Class 1 Priority Claims, Class 3 DIP Claims,
<br />Class 4 Prepetition Lender Claims, Class 5 General Unsecured Claims and Class 6 Equity
<br />Interests). The test, therefore, requires that each holder of a Claim or Equity Interest in those
<br />Classes either accept the Plan or receive or retain under the Plan property having a present value,
<br />as ofthe Effective Date ofthe Plan, of no less than the amount that such holder would receive or
<br />retain if the Debtors were liquidated under chapter 7.
<br />The Proponents have satisfied section 1129(a)(7) with respect to all Classes. Withrespect
<br />to the holders of Claims (or Equity Interests, as applicable) in Classes 1, 5, and 6, such holders
<br />will receive a recovery of no less than the amount that they would receive if these cases were
<br />converted under chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code. s
<br />First, in a chapter 7 liquidation, the Estates would Lose the additional $100,000 payable
<br />under the Released Party Order. That amount is only payable upon confirmation of the Plan,
<br />including the exculpation and release provisions discussed above.
<br />Second, conversion to a chapter 7 would generate additional Administrative Claims and
<br />costs related to the chapter 7 liquidation. The chapter 7 trustee's professionals, including its legal
<br />counsel and accountants, would add administrative expenses that would be entitled to be paid
<br />ahead of Allowed Claims. The Estates would also be obligated to pay all unpaid expenses incurred
<br />by the Debtors and the Committee during these Chapter 11 Cases (such as compensation for
<br />s Section 1129(s)(7) is inapplicable m Classes 3 and 4 because 100% of Hold— in those Classes voted m fsvor of the
<br />Plan.
<br />35
<br />Professionals) before payments could be made to holders of unsecured claims. In addition, the
<br />Cash to be distributed to holders of Claims would be reduced by the chapter 7 trustee's statutory
<br />fee, which is cat -fated on a sliding scale where the maximum compensation is determined based
<br />on the total amount of monies disbursed or turned over by the chapter 7 trustee. The Debtors
<br />already expect to have well over $1 million on hand as of the Effective Date — and may have
<br />several million more after the conclusion of all Litigation —resulting in a fee to the chapter 7 trustee
<br />that could be several hundred thousand dollars.
<br />Third, it is Likely that distributions from a chapter 7 estate would be significantly delayed.
<br />As a result, the present value of such distributions is likely to be materially lower than if made
<br />under the Plan. Therefore, under a chapter 7 Liquidation, holders of Allowed Claims would receive
<br />significantly less than they would receive under the Plan.
<br />IL Acceptance by Impaired Classes (Section 1129(a)(8))
<br />Section 1129(a)(8) of the Bankruptcy Code requires that each class of claims and equity
<br />interests either has accepted a chapter 11 plan or is not impaired under a chapter 11 plan. 11 U.S.C.
<br />§ 1129(a)(8). Class 6 — Equity Interests — were deemed to reject the Plan under section 1126(g)
<br />because they are not entitled to receive or retain any property under the Plan. Even though Class
<br />6 is deemed to reject the Plan, the Plan is confirmable because it satisfies section 1129(b), as further
<br />discussed below.
<br />I. Treatment of Priority Claims (Section 1129(a)(9))
<br />Section 1129(a)(9) ofthe Bankruptcy Code requires full payment of allowed administrative
<br />expense claims and payment over time of allowed priority claims, consistent with Section 507 of
<br />the Bankruptcy Code. As set forth in Article III, Section 3.02(a) of the Plan, the Debtors or the
<br />Liquidating Trustee, as applicable, will pay all Allowed Administrative Claims in cash in full on
<br />the latter of (i) the Effective Date if due on or before that date and unpaid on the Effective Date,
<br />36
<br />
|