Laserfiche WebLink
Case 120-bk-12043 Doc 573 Filed 01/13/21 Entered 01/13/21 110353 Desc Main <br />Document Page 17 of 44 <br />Case 1:20-bk-12043 Doc 573 Filed 01/13/21 Entered 01/13/21 1103:53 Desc Main <br />Document Page 18 of 44 <br />the Class that was solicited to vote are not "material' or "adverse" and thus does not warrant re - <br />solicitation. <br />The Proponents intend to modify the Plan as follows: <br />1. Section 9.05 ofthe Plan, which previously read: "After the Bar Date, as applicable, <br />a Claim may not be filed or amended without the authorization of the Bankruptcy <br />Court and any such new or amended Claim Filed shall be deemed Disallowed and <br />expunged without any further notice to or action, order, or approval of the <br />Bankruptcy Court; provided that, even with such Bankruptcy Court authorization, <br />a Claim may be amended by the Holder of such Claim solely to decrease, but not <br />to increase, unless otherwise provided by the Bankruptcy Court, the amount, <br />number or priority." is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following <br />(changes denoted in bold and underline : "After the Bar Date, as applicable, a <br />Claim may not be filed or amended without the authorization of the Bankruptcy <br />Court and any such new or amended Claim Filed shall be deemed Disallowed and <br />expunged without any further notice to or action, order, or approval of the <br />Bankruptcy Court; provided that a Claim may be amended by the Holder of such <br />Claim without authority from the Bankruptev Court solely to decrease, but not <br />to increase, unless otherwise provided by the Bankruptcy Court, the amount, <br />number or priority." <br />2. The definition of"Distribution Record Date," whichpreviously read: Distribution <br />Record Date' means (i) the Confirmation Date as to the Holders of Allowed <br />Administrative Claims entitled to Distributions pursuant to the Plan and (it) any <br />such date established by the Liquidating Trustee as to Holders of Allowed Other <br />Secured Claims, Allowed Other Priority Claims and Allowed General Unsecured <br />Claims." is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following (changes <br />denoted in bold and underline : "`Distribution Record Date' means (i) the <br />Administrative Claims Bar Date as to the Holders of Allowed Administrative <br />Claims entitled to Distributions pursuant to the Plan and (ii) any such date <br />established by the Liquidating Trustee as to Holders of Allowed Other Secured <br />Claims, Allowed Other Priority Claims and Allowed General Unsecured Claims." <br />3. Section 5.03 of the Plan, which previously read: "The Liquidating Trust will be <br />advised by the "Liquidating Trust Board," which shall initially consist of three <br />voting members designated by the Creditors' Committee." is hereby deleted in its <br />entirety and replaced with the following (changes denoted in bold and underline : <br />"The Liquidating Trust will be advised by the "Liquidating Trust Board," which <br />shall initially consist of five voting members designated by the Creditors' <br />Committee." <br />In addition to the Modifications to the Plan, the Proponents intend to include provisions in <br />17 <br />Case 1:20-bk-12043 Doc 573 Filed 01/13/21 Entered 01/13/21 1103:53 Desc Main <br />Document Page 19 of 44 <br />A. The Plan Complies with the Applicable Provisions of Title 11 (Section <br />1129(a)(1)) <br />Section 1129(a)(1) ofthe Bankruptcy Code requires thata plan comply with the "applicable <br />provisions" of the Bankruptcy Code, including those concerning the form and content of plans, <br />such as Sections 1122 and 1123. See In re Trenton Ridge Investors, LLC, 461 B.R. 440, 463 <br />(Banta. S.D. Ohio 2011); 11 U.S.C. § 1129(a)(1). The Legislative history of section 1129(a)(1) <br />explains that this provision encompasses the requirements of sections 1122 and 1123 of the <br />Bankruptcy Code, which govern classification of claims and interests and the contents ofthe plan, <br />respectively. See S. Rep. No. 95-989, at 126 (1978), as reprinted in 1978 U.S.C.C.A.N. 5787, <br />5912; H.R. Rep. No. 95-595, at 412 (1977), as reprinted in 1978 U.S.C.C.A.N. 5963, 6368; see <br />also In re S & W Enter., 37 B.R. 153, 158 (Bankr. N.D. ILL. 1984) (finding that section 1129(a)(1) <br />is most directly aimed at requiring compliance with the Bankruptcy Code provisions regarding <br />classification of claims or interests and plan contents). <br />L Classification of Claims and Interests (Section 1122) <br />Section 1122(a) of the Bankruptcy Code provides that the claims and interests within a <br />given class must be "substantially similar." 11 U.S.C. § 1122(a). The Plan satisfies section 1122, <br />which provides that "a plan may place a claim or an interest in a particular class only if such claim <br />or interest is substantially similar to the other claims or interests of such class." 11 U.S.C. § <br />I122(a). <br />The Plan's classification scheme easily satisfies the requirements of section 1122. As <br />outlined above, Article II ofthe Plan separately classifies six Classes of Claims against and Equity <br />Interests in the Debtors, as more fully described in the Plan and the Disclosure Statement. Each <br />class differs from one other in a Legal or factual nature or based on other relevant criteria. Thus, <br />the Confirmation Order that resolves the informal comments the Proponents received from certain <br />parties in interest. <br />IV. THE PLAN MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS FOR CONFIRMATION UNDER <br />SECTION 1129 OF THE BANKRUPTCY CODE <br />To confirm the Plan, the Court must find that both the Plan and the Proponents are in <br />compliance with each of the requirements of section 1129(a) of the Bankruptcy Code. See <br />Teamsters Nat?Freight Indus. Negotiating Comm. v. U.S. Track Co. (I re U.S. Track Co), 800 <br />E2d 581, 583 (6th Co. 1986) (noting that section 1129 contains two means by which a <br />reorganization plan can be confirmed, one of which is meeting all the requirements of section <br />1129(a)). Further, the Court may confum a chapter 11 plan Hall ofthe requirements of subsection <br />1129(a) are met with the exception of subsection (a)(8)—and the requirements of section <br />1129(b) of the Bankruptcy Code are satisfied. As set forth below, the Plan should be confirmed <br />because the Proponents meet the requirements of sections 1129(a) and (b) ofthe BankruptcyCode. <br />The Proponents bear the burden of establishing that all elements necessary for confirmation <br />of the Plan under section 1129(a) ofthe Bankruptcy Code have been met by a preponderance of <br />the evidence. See In re Pamplico Highway Der., 468 B.R. 783, 789 (Banta. D.S.C. 2012); In re <br />Trenton Ridge Investors, LLC, 461 B.R. 440, 460 (Banta. S.D. Olio 2011). This Memorandum, <br />the Young Declaration, and the Fairfield Declaration together with the comments of counsel at the <br />Combined Hearing (if necessary), demonstrate, by more than a preponderance of the evidence, <br />that the Plan complies with the requirements of sections 1129(a) and 1129(b) of the Bankruptcy <br />Code, as applicable, with respect to all Classes of Claims and Equity Interests. Accordingly, the <br />Plan should be confirmed. <br />191 <br />Case 1:20-bk-12043 Doc 573 Filed 01/13/21 Entered 01/13/21 1103:53 Desc Main <br />Document Page 20 of 44 <br />the Proponents propose a classification scheme under the Plan that fits well within section 1122's <br />flexible standard. <br />2. Mandatory Contents of the Plan <br />Section 1123(a) of the Bankruptcy Code identifies eight requirements for the contents of a <br />chapter 11 plan.' As demonstrated below, the Plan complies with each such requirement <br />• Section I123(a)(1). As discussed above, Article II of the Plan properly <br />designates all Claims and Equity Interests that require classification, as <br />required by section 1123(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code. Pursuant to section <br />1123(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code, Administrative Claims, U.S. Trustee <br />Fees, Priority Tax Claims, and Professional Fee Claims are not required to <br />be designated into Classes. <br />• Section 1123(a)(2). Section 1123(a)(2) of the Bankruptcy Code requires <br />that a plan specify each Class of Claims or Equity Interests that is <br />Unimpaired under the Plan. Here, Article II of the Plan indicates the one <br />Class of Claim is Unimpaired under the Plan: Class 2 Secured Claims. <br />• Section1123(a)(3). In accordance with 1123(a)(3) ofthe Bankruptcy Code, <br />Article III of the Plan specifies the treatment of each Class of Claims and <br />Equity Interests that is Impaired under the Plan, which are Class 1 (Other <br />Priority Claims), Class 3 (DIP Claims), Class 4 (Prepeotion Lender <br />Claims), Class 5 (General Unsecured Claims), and Class 6 (Equity Interest). <br />• Section 1123(a)(4). In accordance with section 1123(a)(4) of the <br />Bankruptcy Code, Article III of the Plan provides the same treatment for <br />each Claim and Equity Interest in a given Class unless the holder of a Claim <br />or Equity Interest agrees to a Less favorable treatment. <br />• Section 1123(a)(5). In accordance with section 1123(a)(5) of the <br />Bankruptcy Code, Article V and VI of the Plan provides adequate means <br />for the Plan's implementation. Among other things, a Liquidating Trust will <br />be established pursuant to the Plan for the benefit of the Liquidating Trust <br />Beneficiaries and the Liquidation Trust Assets will be transferred to the <br />Liquidating Trust as described in the Plan. Accordingly, the Plan satisfies <br />the requirements set forth in section 1123(a)(5) ofthe Bankruptcy Code. <br />• Section 1123(a)(6). Section 1123(a)(6) of the Bankruptcy Code requires <br />that a plan "provide for the inclusion in the charter of the debtor, if the <br />' This Memorandum will not address section 1123( )(8) as it applies only in cases m which the debtor is an individual, <br />and, therefore, it is not applicable in these chapter 11 cases. <br />19 20 <br />