Laserfiche WebLink
103 <br />These standards and discharge analyses are contained in Exhibit 22, NPDES <br />permit and in the Annual Hydrology Reports. <br />Long term Hydrologic Impacts. Following the completion of mining, the <br />underground working will flood and the potentiometric surface in the coal <br />seams will rebound to near the pre -mining level. Physically the overburden and <br />coal will have increased inter connection and transmissivity for a distance of up <br />to 195 feet above the highest mined seam and will act as an integrated <br />hydrologic unit because of increased fracturing. The 1980 WWL Report <br />estimated that the potentiometric surface would recover to the original level of <br />water in the coal (page 56) Hole LA 221 had a water level in 1976 located <br />304 feet above the top of the Maxwell seam of coal (1994 supplement to <br />Exhibit 8 Table 3A). The elevation of the Allen seam of coal in the <br />approximate center of the New Elk Mine is 7,150. If the 1976 water level <br />information is representative of the original potentiometric surface then the <br />anticipated equilibrium level of water in the coal seam at New Elk Mine would <br />be about 7,450 feet elevation. Given the approximate nature of the water level <br />estimation and the proximity of the predicted elevation to the elevation to the <br />East Portal (7,460 feet) NECC will install a 6 PVC pipe to discharge <br />groundwater from the portal in the event that surface discharge occurs. <br />The water quality of the water filling the mine will reflect a mixture of five years <br />of pumping of thickener into the mine with inflow from the coal seam and other <br />sources. This will not materially change the beneficial uses that can be acquired <br />from the Allen and Apache seams as they are not acceptable for use as a domestic <br />water source or a flood irrigation source due to salinity levels. In addition, the <br />coal seam aquifers exceed MLRD suspect levels for stock watering for iron <br />manganese and fluoride. <br />Water quality along the Middle Fork of the Purgatoire will experience a <br />diminished water quality following the discharge of water from the flooded <br />workings. Salinity, sulfate, and SAR levels will increase, but projections of <br />water quality during low flow show that beneficial uses will not be <br />compromised. Ammonia concentrations in the river have historically exceeded <br />chronic aquatic life receiving stream standards. The discharge of water from the <br />flooded workings is projected to improve the water slightly, but not enough to <br />meet the standards. Table 26C (Figure 22 at end of this Section) <br />delineates loading of parameters which potentially could impair use. <br />Monitoring of impacts during mining and previous studies of probable <br />hydrologic consequences (WWL, 1980 and Greystone, 1994) indicate that <br />underground inflows and mine dewatering have little or no communication with <br />surface water. This conclusion is consistent with the subsidence analysis and <br />conceptual model for the New Elk Mine. The maximum extent of subsidence <br />fracturing with increased vertical transmissivity is projected to extend 195 feet <br />above the top of the highest mined coal. The minimum thickness of <br />overburden between the Apache seam and drainage bottoms is 450 feet. A zone <br />Section 2.05 RN -6 Revised 02/07/2017 <br />