Laserfiche WebLink
COLORADO <br /> Division of Reclamation, <br /> Mining and Safety <br /> Department of Natural Resources <br /> December 3, 2020 <br /> Jim Harrington <br /> Colorado Legacy Land, LLC <br /> 4601 DTC Blvd. - Suite 130 <br /> Denver, CO 80237 <br /> RE: Schwartzwalder Mine, Permit No. M-1977-300, 112d-2 Amendment Application (AM-5), <br /> Adequacy Review No. 2 <br /> Mr. Harrington: <br /> The Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety(Division) has completed its 2nd adequacy review of the <br /> materials submitted for the above referenced application. All comment and review periods for the <br /> application began on September 10, 2020, when the application was called complete for filing purposes. <br /> The decision date for the application is set for December 9, 2020. <br /> After reviewing the operator's response submitted via email on November 23, 2020 (and via mail on <br /> November 30, 2020), the Division has identified adequacy items requiring additional clarification or <br /> information. These items are listed below under their respective exhibit heading and numbered <br /> sequentially: <br /> Exhibit B—Index Map (Rule 6.4.2): <br /> 1) The format of the revised index map is acceptable. However, the location of the affected lands is not <br /> indicated on the map, as required. Please provide a revised index map which indicates the location of <br /> the affected lands. This is typically done by adding the mine name to the map with an arrow and/or <br /> circle indicating the location of the mine site. <br /> Exhibit C—Pre-Mining and Mining Plan Map(s) of Affected Lands (Rule 6.4.3): <br /> 2) The revised Exhibit C-1 map does not legibly portray the affected land boundary (and proposed <br /> expansion areas) due to the many text boxes overlapping the boundary and the depiction of the <br /> underground workings(not a required feature),which obscure portions of the boundary.Additionally, <br /> the revised map does not show less of the property boundary(not a required feature) and more of the <br /> affected land boundary, as recommended by the Division in its preliminary adequacy review letter. <br /> Please provide a revised Exhibit C-1 map which shows a closer view of the affected land boundary <br /> with minimal to no features overlapping the boundary, and with the underground workings feature <br /> removed. <br /> Exhibit E—Reclamation Plan (Rule 6.4.5): <br /> il�_�. ,il _ i0 <br /> ♦ 1 <br /> x 1876 <br />