Laserfiche WebLink
Figure 2.2-3 CARMMS 2025 TRFO Federal High Oil and Gas Scenario Emissions tpy(Environ 2017) <br /> The high scenario oil and gas development emissions are large enough to account for all of the reasonably <br /> foreseeable activities outlined in the CARMMS report that have significant emissions generation potential <br /> (refer to Figure 2.2-4). <br /> As can be seen in the source apportionment results,the impacts are mostly the result of development in <br /> and proximate to the Gothic Shale Play area.The King II Mine has far fewer NOx and VOC emissions than <br /> that of the high oil and gas scenario, such that the mine itself would not be expected to contribute <br /> significantly to direct 03 formation.Several other data metrics produced by CARMMS to describe potential <br /> impacts to sensitive resources are disclosed in Table 2.2-17 below. <br /> Table 2.2-17 Maximum Source Group Contributions Mines and TRFO High Oil and Gas <br /> Scenarios (H & R) <br /> Visibility Impacts Deposition AQRV Max Contribution <br /> S to Exceedance <br /> Source Group <br /> Max Days> Days> (kgN/ha-yr) Impacted O3(ppb) PMz.s <br /> dv 0.5dv 1.Odv Area (ug/m3) <br /> CO Mines(Class I Area) 0.6034 1 0 0.0581 Flat Tops 0.2071 0.0287 <br /> TRFO O&G(Class I Area) 0.0407 0 0 0.0062 Weminuche 0.0666 0.0134 <br /> CO Mines(Class 11 Area) 0.6442 2 0 0.1730 Dinosaur NM 0.2071 0.0287 <br /> TRFO O&G(Class 11 Area) 0.0886 0 0 0.0133 S.San Juan 0.0666 0.0134 <br /> dv=deciviews <br /> kgN=kilograms of nitrogen <br /> ha =hectares <br /> Dunn Ranch Area LBA and Mining Plan Modification 32 <br /> Technical Resources Report <br />