My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2020-11-03_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1980004
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1980004
>
2020-11-03_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1980004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/3/2020 12:24:28 PM
Creation date
11/3/2020 9:29:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980004
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
11/3/2020
Doc Name Note
Case No. 20-12043 (GRH) Hopedale Mining LLC
Doc Name
Bankruptcy Notice
From
DRMS
To
Epiq Corpoorate Restructuring, LLC
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Email Name
JRS
JDM
GRM
CMM
CCW
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Case 1:20-bk-12043 Doc 498 Filed 10/23/20 Entered 10/23/20 08:57:50 Desc Main <br />Document Page 3 of 5 <br />current Filing Exclusivity Period and Soliciting Exclusivity Period will expire on November 19, <br />2020 and January 18, 2021, respectively, absent further order of this Court. <br />5. Section 1121(d)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code permits this Court to extend a debtor's <br />exclusivity "for cause," subject to certain limitations not relevant here. Although the Bankruptcy <br />Code does not define the term "cause," the legislative history indicates the term should be viewed <br />flexibly "in order to allow the debtor to reach an agreement." H.R. Rep. No. 95, 95th Cong., 1 st <br />Sess. 232 (1997); see also In re Amko Plastics, Inc., 197 B.R. 74, 77 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 1996); <br />accord Gaines v. Perkins (In re Perkins), 71 B.R. 294, 297-98 (W.D. Tenn. 1987); Teachers Insur. <br />& Annuity Assoc. of Am. v. Lake in the Woods (In re Lake in the Woods), 10 B.R. 338, 344-45 <br />(E.D. Mich. 1981); In re Ravenna Indus., Inc., 20 B.R. 886, 889 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 1982); In re <br />Ames Dep't Stores Inc., 1991 WL 259036, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 25, 1991) ("The purpose of the <br />Bankruptcy Code's exclusivity period is to allow the debtor flexibility to negotiate with its <br />creditors."). <br />6. The decision to extend exclusivity is fact -specific; courts examine several factors <br />to determine whether "cause" exists to extend the Exclusivity Periods. These factors include (a) <br />the size and complexity of the case, (b) the debtor's progress in resolving issues facing the estate, <br />and (c) whether an extension of time will harm the debtor's creditors. See, e.g., Amko Plastics, 197 <br />B.R. at 76-77; accord In re Gibson & Cushman Dredging Corp., 101 B.R. 405, 409-10 (E.D.N.Y. <br />1989); In re Serv. Merch. Co., Inc., 256 B.R. 744, 751-54 (Bankr. M.D. Tenn. 2000); In re Crescent <br />Mfg. Co., 122 B.R. 979, 982-83 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 1990); In re Southwest Oil Co. ofJourdanton, <br />Inc., 84 B.R. 448, 451-54 (Bankr. W.D. Tex. 1987). <br />7. Under these standards, the "cause" required by 11 U.S.C. § 1121(d)(1) is present in <br />these Chapter 11 Cases. As this Court is aware, on September 4, 2020, this Court entered its <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.