My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2020-10-27_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981035
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981035
>
2020-10-27_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981035
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/29/2020 1:41:04 PM
Creation date
10/29/2020 1:05:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981035
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
10/27/2020
Doc Name Note
For PR10
Doc Name
Proposed Decision and Findings of Compliance
From
DRMS
To
GCC Energy, LLC
Permit Index Doc Type
Findings
Email Name
JHB
THM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
House Sandstone through intergranular porosity in roof rock of the workings <br />because the roof rock is composed of shale, which probably is impermeable to <br />water. (Drill hole sample logs in Appendix 4 of the permit show the Upper <br />Coal Seam of the Menefee formation, the seam mined at the King I Mine, is <br />bounded above and below by shale.) Subsidence fractures in the roof rock, <br />however, could provide a conduit of flow for water from the workings to the <br />overlying Cliff House. Therefore, if the workings fill with water, and <br />subsidence fractures convey that water to the Cliff House Sandstone, then <br />impacts could possibly occur to the water quality in the Cliff House Sandstone <br />aquifer down -dip from the workings, if mine water is lower quality than <br />ambient ground water. Significant flow from the workings to the Cliff House <br />through subsidence fractures is unlikely, however, because head in the <br />overlying (higher elevation) Cliff House would be greater than the head <br />exerted by the mine water. <br />Menefee Formation- Like the Cliff House Sandstone, mining impacts to the <br />Menefee formation are improbable because it is unlikely the workings of the <br />King I and II Mines will fill with water. <br />Surface Water Effects <br />With the exception of two small area exemptions, all runoff from the disturbed <br />area at the mine site will be routed through sediment ponds. Effects of mining <br />on this water will involve changes in the magnitude and duration of runoff and <br />changes in water quality. <br />The effects on water quantity are expected to be minimal. A decrease in <br />permeability due to the construction or roads and buildings can be expected to <br />cause an increase in runoff amounts. The rate of runoff will increase over <br />natural conditions because of the increased efficiency of conveyance channels. <br />However, these effects are moderated by the detention of runoff in the pond <br />and subsequent evaporation of pond water. In general, only slight changes in <br />the hydrologic balance of surface water are expected due to the underground <br />mining operations proposed at the King I and 11 Mines. <br />Changes in water quality can be expected to occur as a result of mining. <br />Increases in erosion rates are expected from the disturbance of soils and <br />vegetation; however, these are compensated by deposition of sediment in the <br />sediment ponds. An increase in total dissolved solids (TDS) may occur from <br />well water pumped and used for dust suppression and other operational use. <br />Evaporation of water standing in the ponds may also cause an increase in TDS, <br />although the increase above background concentrations (1500-2000 mg/1) is <br />14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.