My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2020-10-29_REVISION - C1981035
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981035
>
2020-10-29_REVISION - C1981035
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/29/2020 1:41:08 PM
Creation date
10/29/2020 7:23:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981035
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
10/29/2020
Doc Name
Proposed Decision and Findings of Compliance
From
DRMS
To
GCC Energy, LLC
Type & Sequence
PR10
Email Name
JHB
THM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
House Sandstone through intergranular porosity in roof rock of the workings <br />because the roof rock is composed of shale, which probably is impermeable to <br />water. (Drill hole sample logs in Appendix 4 of the permit show the Upper <br />Coal Seam of the Menefee formation, the seam mined at the King I Mine, is <br />bounded above and below by shale.) Subsidence fractures in the roof rock, <br />however, could provide a conduit of flow for water from the workings to the <br />overlying Cliff House. Therefore, if the workings fill with water, and <br />subsidence fractures convey that water to the Cliff House Sandstone, then <br />impacts could possibly occur to the water quality in the Cliff House Sandstone <br />aquifer down -dip from the workings, if mine water is lower quality than <br />ambient ground water. Significant flow from the workings to the Cliff House <br />through subsidence fractures is unlikely, however, because head in the <br />overlying (higher elevation) Cliff House would be greater than the head <br />exerted by the mine water. <br />Menefee Formation- Like the Cliff House Sandstone, mining impacts to the <br />Menefee formation are improbable because it is unlikely the workings of the <br />King I and II Mines will fill with water. <br />Surface Water Effects <br />With the exception of two small area exemptions, all runoff from the disturbed <br />area at the mine site will be routed through sediment ponds. Effects of mining <br />on this water will involve changes in the magnitude and duration of runoff and <br />changes in water quality. <br />The effects on water quantity are expected to be minimal. A decrease in <br />permeability due to the construction or roads and buildings can be expected to <br />cause an increase in runoff amounts. The rate of runoff will increase over <br />natural conditions because of the increased efficiency of conveyance channels. <br />However, these effects are moderated by the detention of runoff in the pond <br />and subsequent evaporation of pond water. In general, only slight changes in <br />the hydrologic balance of surface water are expected due to the underground <br />mining operations proposed at the King I and 11 Mines. <br />Changes in water quality can be expected to occur as a result of mining. <br />Increases in erosion rates are expected from the disturbance of soils and <br />vegetation; however, these are compensated by deposition of sediment in the <br />sediment ponds. An increase in total dissolved solids (TDS) may occur from <br />well water pumped and used for dust suppression and other operational use. <br />Evaporation of water standing in the ponds may also cause an increase in TDS, <br />although the increase above background concentrations (1500-2000 mg/1) is <br />14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.