Laserfiche WebLink
October 15,2020 C-1996-084/Lorencito Canyon Mine DCI <br /> Inspection Topic Summary <br /> NOTE: Y=Inspected N=Not Inspected R=Comments Noted V=Violation Issued NA=Not Applicable <br /> N -Air Resource Protection Y -Roads <br /> N -Availability of Records N -Reclamation Success <br /> N -Backfill&Grading Y -Revegetation <br /> Y -Excess Spoil and Dev. Waste N - Subsidence <br /> N -Explosives N - Slides and Other Damage <br /> Y -Fish&Wildlife N - Support Facilities On-site <br /> Y -Hydrologic Balance N - Signs and Markers <br /> N -Gen. Compliance With Mine Plan N - Support Facilities Not On-site <br /> N -Other N - Special Categories Of Mining <br /> N -Processing Waste N -Topsoil <br /> CONIMENTS <br /> EXCESS SPOIL and DEVELOPMENT WASTE—Rule 4.09 <br /> Placement;Drainage Control; Surface Stabilization: <br /> Fills 7, 8, and 9 were inspected.No large rills or gullies were seen. The vegetation on all three fills looks very <br /> good. <br /> FISH and WILDLIFE—Rule 4.18: <br /> A small herd of Elk was seen during the inspection. <br /> HYDROLOGIC BALANCE -Rule 4.05 <br /> Drainage Control 4.05.1,4.05.2,4.05.3; Siltation Structures 4.05.5,4.05.6; Discharge Structures 4.05.7,4.05.10; <br /> Diversions 4.05.4;Effluent Limits 4.05.2; Ground Water Monitoring 4.05.13; Surface Water Monitoring 4.05.13; <br /> Drainage —Acid and Toxic Materials 4.05.8;Impoundments 4.05.6,4.05.9; Stream Buffer Zones 4.05.18: <br /> Ponds 005, 006a, 007a, 008, 009, and 009a were inspected.All ponds were dry and no problems with <br /> embankments, spillways,or any other feature were noted during the inspection. <br /> Ditches seen throughout the site were well maintained and no problems were noted. <br /> Several culverts on the site were seen with water.No issues were noted. <br /> ROADS—Rule 4.03 <br /> Number of Partial Inspection this Fiscal Year: 2 <br /> Number of Complete Inspections this Fiscal Year: 2 <br /> Page 2 of 8 <br />