My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2020-10-15_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1980004 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1980004
>
2020-10-15_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1980004 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/15/2020 11:58:04 AM
Creation date
10/15/2020 7:32:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980004
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
10/15/2020
Doc Name Note
Case No. 20-12043 (GRH) Hopedale Mining LLC
Doc Name
Bankruptcy Notice
From
Foley & Lardner. LLP
To
DRMS
Email Name
JRS
JDM
GRM
CMM
CCW
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Case 1:20-bk-12043 Doc 453 Filed 10/06/20 Entered 10/06/20 15:26:47 Desc Main <br />Document Page 2 of 9 <br />The policy provides direct coverage to the estate. The proceeds of the policy are therefore property <br />of the estate. Unlike a claim under D&O insurance policies that provide a direct benefit to officers <br />and directors, Mr. Hughs seeks indemnification from the Debtors, who are in turn entitled to <br />insurance coverage for that indemnification under a liability policy. This means that to the extent <br />the Debtors are obligated to indemnify Mr. Hughs, then the insurance policy pays the Debtors for <br />those costs, not Mr. Hughs. <br />For this claim, the Debtors are the beneficiaries of this policy, bringing the policy and its <br />proceeds entirely within the section 541 definition of property of the Debtors' estates. By <br />attempting to obtain proceeds directly from the policy, Mr. Hughs is seeking to elevate his claim <br />above that of other unsecured creditors, which he cannot do. The Court should deny the Motion. <br />RELEVANT BACKGROUND FACTS <br />1. The Debtors and Mr. Hughs are beneficiaries under an Executive and Corporate <br />Securities Liability Insurance Policy issued by XL Professional Insurance (the "Policy"). As set <br />forth in the Policy, different coverage parts apply to different insureds. <br />2. Mr. Hughs alleges that he has a contractual and legal right to indemnification for at <br />least some of his costs incurred arising out of the various investigations of the Debtors and their <br />non -debtor affiliates. See, e.g., Doc. 429 at ¶¶ 11-14 (citing partnership agreements and by-laws). <br />3. Hughs concedes that his is a claim for indemnification. See id. ¶ 21 ("That demand <br />for advancement has matured into a demand for indemnification as Hughs has incurred <br />$389,271.28 in fees and expenses related to the investigations and Delaware case.") <br />4. To this point, the Policy specifically provides: <br />[w]ith respect to the Company's indemnification of its Insured <br />Persons, the certificate of incorporation, charger, by-laws, articles <br />of association, or other organizational documents of the Parent <br />Company, each Subsidiary and each Non -Profit Entity or Joint <br />Venture, will be deemed to require indemnification to the Insured <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.