My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2020-10-13_PERMIT FILE - M2020041
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2020041
>
2020-10-13_PERMIT FILE - M2020041
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/28/2024 4:58:01 AM
Creation date
10/14/2020 9:05:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2020041
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
10/13/2020
Doc Name
Objection
From
Summit Capital, LLC
To
DRMS
Email Name
ECS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
October 7,2020 <br /> Mr. Means and Mr. Scott <br /> Page 4 <br /> proposed Phase 1. That is a significant element of the proposed PRR Mine plan that will affect the <br /> operations and reclamation at the MCRA Mine. The application for the proposed PRR Mine does not <br /> address where the waste fines will be impounded and how the final reclamation will accommodate <br /> that waste. <br /> Water quality is an additional environmental concern. There is no evidence in Exhibit G — <br /> Water Information of Peak's PRR Mine application that the applicant considered/assessed the water <br /> treatment requirements for the wash water used in processing the raw materials to be extracted from <br /> the PRR Mine at the MCRA Mine. The chemical properties of the fine soils (clay/silt fraction) at the <br /> proposed PRR Mine may be different than those at the MCRA Mine and would require different or <br /> more aggressive treatment. An inability to treat the wash water from the proposed PRR Mine would <br /> be manifested as suspended solids discharged at Outfall 002A, adjacent to the north end of the Love <br /> Pit Wetland. That would have a substantial impact on the Love Pit Wetland. The application does not <br /> describe how this will be prevented. <br /> For these reasons, among others, the application should address the impacts of off-site <br /> processing at the MCRA Mine of the raw materials to be extracted from the PPR Mine, especially <br /> during the proposed Phase 1. <br /> MCRA Mine Permit does not Contemplate or Consider Processing of Off-Site Materials and Requires an <br /> Amendment of the Pemut <br /> Peak's original application, subsequent Amendments, and Technical Revisions to the MCRA <br /> Mine Permit No. M 1996-049 do not contemplate or consider processing raw materials from off-site <br /> locations, as is proposed by Peak in the PRR Mine application. Figure 2 shows the current mining <br /> area, projected future mining cells, and the process facilities as "Lake 6". The 1996 MCRA Mine <br /> application states that the expected production schedule for the MCRA Mine will be as follows <br /> (Reference 1996-49 Application,Exhibit D,Page D-2): <br /> • Years 27 through 30—Mining of Cell 4 <br /> • Years 31 through 38—Mining of Cell 5 <br /> • Years 39 through 45—Mining of Cell 6(Process Plant Area) <br /> • Years 46 through 50—Finish lining augmentation pond and demobilize <br /> {00101951) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.