My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2020-10-12_PERMIT FILE - M2020047
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2020047
>
2020-10-12_PERMIT FILE - M2020047
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/9/2025 4:07:10 AM
Creation date
10/13/2020 8:46:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2020047
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
10/12/2020
Doc Name
Completeness Response
From
Delta Brick & Climate Company
To
DRMS
Email Name
DMC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Nationwide Permit 33 Summary Page 3 <br /> ❑ 18. Endangered Species. ❑ (d) As a result of formal or informal consultation <br /> ❑ (a) No activity is authorized under any NWP which with the FWS or NMFS the district engineer may add <br /> is likely to directly or indirectly jeopardize the continued species specific permit conditions to the NWPs. <br /> existence of a threatened or endangered species or a ❑ (e) Authorization of an activity by an NWP does not <br /> species proposed for such designation,as identified under authorize the "take" of a threatened or endangered <br /> the Federal Endangered Species Act(ESA),or which will species as defined under the ESA. In the absence of <br /> directly or indirectly destroy or adversely modify the separate authorization(e.g.,an ESA Section 10 Permit,a <br /> critical habitat of such species.No activity is authorized Biological Opinion with "incidental take" provisions, <br /> under any NWP which "may affect" a listed species or etc.)from the FWS or the NMFS,the Endangered Species <br /> critical habitat,unless ESA section 7 consultation Act prohibits any person subject to the jurisdiction of the <br /> addressing the effects of the proposed activity has been United States to take a listed species,where "take" <br /> completed.Direct effects are the immediate effects on means to harass,harm,pursue,hunt,shoot,wound,kill, <br /> listed species and critical habitat caused by the NWP trap,capture,or collect,or to attempt to engage in any <br /> activity.Indirect effects are those effects on listed species such conduct.The word"harm" in the definition of <br /> and critical habitat that are caused by the NWP activity "take" means an act which actually kills or injures <br /> and are later in time,but still are reasonably certain to wildlife.Such an act may include significant habitat <br /> occur. modification or degradation where it actually kills or <br /> ❑ (b) Federal agencies should follow their own injures wildlife by significantly impairing essential <br /> procedures for complying with the requirements of the behavioral patterns,including breeding,feeding or <br /> ESA. If preconstruction notification is required for the sheltering. <br /> proposed activity,the Federal permittee must provide the ❑ (f) f the non-federal permittee has a valid ESA <br /> district engineer with the appropriate documentation to section 10(a)(1)(B)incidental take permit with an <br /> demonstrate compliance with those requirements. The approved Habitat Conservation Plan for a project or a <br /> district engineer will verify that the appropriate group of projects that includes the proposed NWP <br /> documentation has been submitted. If the appropriate activity,the non-federal applicant should provide a copy <br /> documentation has not been submitted,additional ESA of that ESA section 10(a)(1)(B)permit with the PCN <br /> section 7 consultation may be necessary for the activity required by paragraph(c)of this general condition.The <br /> and the respective federal agency would be responsible district engineer will coordinate with the agency that <br /> for fulfilling its obligation under section 7 of the ESA. issued the ESA section 10(a)(1)(B)permit to determine <br /> ❑ (c) Non-federal permittees must submit a pre- whether the proposed NWP activity and the associated <br /> construction notification to the district engineer if any incidental take were considered in the internal ESA <br /> listed species or designated critical habitat might be section 7 consultation conducted for the ESA section <br /> affected or is in the vicinity of the activity,or if the 10(a)(1)(B)permit.If that coordination results in <br /> activity is located in designated critical habitat,and shall concurrence from the agency that the proposed NWP <br /> not begin work on the activity until notified by the district activity and the associated incidental take were <br /> engineer that the requirements of the ESA have been considered in the internal ESA section 7 consultation for <br /> satisfied and that the activity is authorized.For activities the ESA section 10(a)(1)(B)permit,the district engineer <br /> that might affect Federally-listed endangered or does not need to conduct a separate ESA section 7 <br /> threatened species or designated critical habitat,the pre- consultation for the proposed NWP activity. The district <br /> construction notification must include the name(s)of the engineer will notify the non-federal applicant within 45 <br /> endangered or threatened species that might be affected days of receipt of a complete pre-construction notification <br /> by the proposed activity or that utilize the designated whether the ESA section 10(a)(1)(B)permit covers the <br /> critical habitat that might be affected by the proposed proposed NWP activity or whether additional ESA <br /> activity. The district engineer will determine whether the section 7 consultation is required. <br /> proposed activity "may affect" or will have"no effect" ❑ (g) Information on the location of threatened and <br /> to listed species and designated critical habitat and will endangered species and their critical habitat can be <br /> notify the non-Federal applicant of the Corps' obtained directly from the offices of the FWS and NMFS <br /> determination within 45 days of receipt of a complete pre- or their world wide Web pages at http://www.fws.pov/or <br /> construction notification. In cases where the non-Federal http://www.fws.gov/ipac and <br /> applicant has identified listed species or critical habitat http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/species/esa/respectively. <br /> that might be affected or is in the vicinity of the activity, ❑ 19. Migratory Birds and Bald and Golden Eagles.The <br /> and has so notified the Corps,the applicant shall not permittee is responsible for ensuring their action complies with <br /> begin work until the Corps has provided notification that the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the Bald and Golden Eagle <br /> the proposed activity will have "no effect" on listed Protection Act.The permittee is responsible for contacting <br /> species or critical habitat,or until ESA section 7 appropriate local office of the U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service to <br /> consultation has been completed.If the non-Federal determine applicable measures to reduce impacts to migratory <br /> applicant has not heard back from the Corps within 45 birds or eagles,including whether"incidental take" permits are <br /> days,the applicant must still wait for notification from the necessary and available under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act or <br /> Corps. Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act for a particular activity. <br /> ❑ 20. Historic Properties. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.