Laserfiche WebLink
Case 1:20-bk-12043 Doc 303 Filed 08/28/20 Entered 08/28/20 11:03:45 Desc Main <br /> Document Page 9 of 13 <br /> "$0.00,"is significantly less than the actual amount due according to Wintrust's books and records. <br /> (Hallauer Decl. at¶ 10). <br /> 28. The Bankruptcy Code requires the Debtors to cure all defaults under an unexpired <br /> lease as of the date of assumption. Section 365(b)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code provides: <br /> (b)(1) If there has been a default in an executory contract or <br /> unexpired lease of the debtor, the trustee may not assume such contract or <br /> lease unless, at the time of assumption of such contract or lease,the trustee <br /> (A) cures, or provides adequate assurance that the trustee <br /> will promptly cure, such default . . .; <br /> (B) compensates,or provides adequate assurance that the <br /> trustee will promptly compensate, a party other than the debtor to <br /> such contract or lease, for any actual pecuniary loss to such party <br /> resulting from such default; and <br /> (C) provides adequate assurance of future performance <br /> under such contract or lease. <br /> 11 U.S.C. § 365(b)(1). <br /> 29. The proposed cure costs in the Notice of Cure Costs are"as of July 21, 2020." The <br /> Notice makes no provision for payment of post-petition amounts due which have not been paid by <br /> the Debtors. The assumption of the Lease Agreement should be conditioned on compensation to <br /> Wintrust for rent and other charges or pecuniary losses that are or may become due through the <br /> date of assumption, and Wintrust reserves all rights to such compensation. <br /> 30. "With respect to the requirements of§ 365,in order to assume a contract,the Debtor <br /> must cure or provide adequate assurance that any default would be cured; compensate or provide <br /> adequate assurance for any actual pecuniary loss to a party other than the Debtor resulting from <br /> the default; and provide adequate assurance of future performance under the contract." In re Plum <br /> Run Serv. Corp., 159 B.R. 496, 500 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 1993). See also Heidtman Steel Prod., Inc. <br /> 9 <br />