My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2020-08-28_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1980004 (6)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1980004
>
2020-08-28_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1980004 (6)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/28/2024 4:34:52 AM
Creation date
9/16/2020 8:39:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980004
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
8/28/2020
Doc Name Note
Case No. 20-12043 (GRH) Hopedale Mining LLC
Doc Name
Objection of Wintrust Commercial Finance to Sale Motion
From
DRMS Website
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Email Name
JRS
JDM
GRM
CMM
CCW
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Case 1:20-bk-12043 Doc 303 Filed 08/28/20 Entered 08/28/20 11:03:45 Desc Main <br /> Document Page 7 of 13 <br /> 18. While the Debtors are not permitted by the Bankruptcy Code to sell the Wintrust <br /> Equipment absent further agreement with Wintrust, they may assign the Lease Agreement as an <br /> unexpired lease,provided that the requirements of Section 365 of the Bankruptcy Code are met. <br /> B. A more certain time schedule is needed for lease rejection and return of <br /> equipment. <br /> 19. The Sale Motion is also objectionable because of the uncertainty about rejection of <br /> the Lease Agreement and return of the Wintrust Equipment. <br /> 20. If the purchaser of the Debtors' assets decides not to assume the Lease Agreement, <br /> the debtors-in-possession are exposed to continued administrative expense until Rhino Energy <br /> LLC has fulfilled its fiduciary duty to provide for the return of the Wintrust Equipment to Wintrust <br /> in accordance with the terms of the Lease Agreement. See In re Hayes Lemmerz Intern., Inc., 340 <br /> B.R. 461, 476-80 (Bankr. D. Del. 2006) (granting administrative expense claim to equipment <br /> lessor for lessee's failure to maintain equipment and post-petition damage to equipment); In re <br /> Trucking Services, Inc., 851 F.2d 159, 162 (6th Cir. 1988) (lessor is entitled to administrative <br /> expense under section 503 for failure of lessee to repair leased equipment). <br /> 21. After an "Event of Default" under the Lease Agreement, Rhino Energy LLC is <br /> required to return the Wintrust Equipment to Wintrust,if requested to do so by Wintrust. (Hallauer <br /> Decl. at¶ 18). Alternatively,Rhino Energy LLC agreed to allow its premises to be used for storage <br /> of the Wintrust Equipment, without liability, after an Event of Default occurs. (Id.). <br /> 22. As a result of the size and weight of the Wintrust Equipment, transporting the <br /> equipment over the road to a new location would be burdensome and expensive. (Id. at¶ 17). If <br /> the Lease Agreement is not assigned in connection with the Debtors' asset sale, the Debtors and <br /> Wintrust stand to benefit if the Wintrust Equipment can be remarketed from its current locations. <br /> 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.