My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2020-09-08_PERMIT FILE - M2020008 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2020008
>
2020-09-08_PERMIT FILE - M2020008 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/19/2024 7:54:10 AM
Creation date
9/8/2020 8:15:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2020008
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
9/8/2020
Doc Name
Comment Acknowledgement/Response
From
Douglas Grant
To
DRMS
Email Name
ECS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mined Land Board/Reclamation Mining and Safety <br /> August 30, 2020 <br /> Page 2 <br /> water ditch back to the river. If irrigation water rights are nonexistent there is no prescriptive right <br /> to any drain ditch because there was no water to put in the drain ditch from irrigating the Scott <br /> property. <br /> Response No.6 We may not be adjacent property owners by rule but owners of land discharge <br /> water will cross via a drain ditch from the proposed pit back to the Colorado River should have been <br /> notified no different than discharging to a City storm sewer, or Private irrigation ditch, or <br /> designating a private road as access the pit they don't own.They need permission from the owners. <br /> Response No.12 The drain ditch that crosses our property going to the Colorado River does not <br /> cross Scott pit property. The ditch being addressed as Island Park Ditch that crosses the Scott pit <br /> property is different than the drain ditch crossing our property. The drain ditch built by the US Soil <br /> Conservation Service is on Island Park property and Grant Bros Property. Not the Scott property. <br /> Furthermore Grant Bros property do not discharge into the US Soil Conservation Service or the <br /> Island Park Ditches. WE have a discharge point for emergency use only. (Flooding etc.) 3000 gallons <br /> per minute discharge rate will rise the level in the drain ditch to the point of over flowing when <br /> added to the high flows in the irrigation season. Who is responsible for the flooding damage?Who <br /> pays for the added cost of pumping infiltration water in our gravel pit?These are damages that can <br /> result unless they are addressed now in this process. There is no prescriptive easement for the drain <br /> ditch for a new use dewatering a new gravel pit. <br /> Response No. 15 The Exhibit E Reclamation Plan; Rule 6.4.5 This plan calls for testing of import <br /> material. Yet the response to my comment No. 15 Currently there is no plan to backfill the pit. <br /> Require testing of import. <br /> The response to objections packet now has a wash plant. Is there going to be chemicals used <br /> (flocculants) on site if so who tests so none get in the discharge water? Is the water from the wash <br /> plant mixed with the discharged water and dilution is the solution?Where does the wash out mud <br /> go? How does it stay out of the discharge water? <br /> The new packet has a wash out basin/pond for concrete where does the wash out water go? <br /> The two main issues I have with the response to my comments are: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.