My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2020-08-28_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1980004 (7)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1980004
>
2020-08-28_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1980004 (7)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/28/2020 1:43:32 PM
Creation date
8/28/2020 12:10:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980004
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
8/28/2020
Doc Name Note
Hopedale Mining , LLC Case No. 20-12043 (GRH)
Doc Name
Objection of Wintrust Commercial Finance to Sale Motion & Equipment Lease Cure Cost
From
Brook Gibson
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Email Name
JRS
JDM
CMM
GRM
CCW
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Case 1:20-bk-12043 Doc 303 Filed 08/28/20 Entered 08/28/20 11:03:45 Desc Main <br />Document Page 7 of 13 <br />18. While the Debtors are not permitted by the Bankruptcy Code to sell the Wintrust <br />Equipment absent further agreement with Wintrust, they may assign the Lease Agreement as an <br />unexpired lease, provided that the requirements of Section 365 of the Bankruptcy Code are met. <br />B. A more certain time schedule is needed for lease rejection and return of <br />equipment. <br />19. The Sale Motion is also objectionable because of the uncertainty about rejection of <br />the Lease Agreement and return of the Wintrust Equipment. <br />20. If the purchaser of the Debtors' assets decides not to assume the Lease Agreement, <br />the debtors -in -possession are exposed to continued administrative expense until Rhino Energy <br />LLC has fulfilled its fiduciary duty to provide for the return of the Wintrust Equipment to Wintrust <br />in accordance with the terms of the Lease Agreement. See In re Hayes Lemmerz Intern., Inc., 340 <br />B.R. 461, 476-80 (Bankr. D. Del. 2006) (granting administrative expense claim to equipment <br />lessor for lessee's failure to maintain equipment and post-petition damage to equipment); In re <br />Trucking Services, Inc., 851 F.2d 159, 162 (6th Cir. 1988) (lessor is entitled to administrative <br />expense under section 503 for failure of lessee to repair leased equipment). <br />21. After an "Event of Default" under the Lease Agreement, Rhino Energy LLC is <br />required to return the Wintrust Equipment to Wintrust, if requested to do so by Wintrust. (Hallauer <br />Decl. at ¶ 18). Alternatively, Rhino Energy LLC agreed to allow its premises to be used for storage <br />of the Wintrust Equipment, without liability, after an Event of Default occurs. (Id.). <br />22. As a result of the size and weight of the Wintrust Equipment, transporting the <br />equipment over the road to a new location would be burdensome and expensive. (Id. at ¶ 17). If <br />the Lease Agreement is not assigned in connection with the Debtors' asset sale, the Debtors and <br />Wintrust stand to benefit if the Wintrust Equipment can be remarketed from its current locations. <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.