My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2020-08-21_REVISION - C1994082 (36)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1994082
>
2020-08-21_REVISION - C1994082 (36)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/28/2024 12:29:35 AM
Creation date
8/26/2020 6:04:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1994082
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
8/21/2020
Doc Name
Proposed Decision and Findings of Compliance
From
DRMS
To
Seneca Property LLC
Type & Sequence
RN5
Permit Index Doc Type
Findings
Email Name
RAR
JLE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Alluvium, additional downgradient chemical changes, and dilution and mixing from <br /> shallow bedrock units which discharge to the alluvium. <br /> Seneca Property, LLC predicts that the maximum TDS increase in the Annand Draw <br /> Alluvium will be 58% immediately below there-saturated spoil, attenuating to less than <br /> 5% near the confluence of Lower Grassy Creek and Scotchman's Gulch. The predicted <br /> TDS increases in the Grassy Creek and Armand Draw Alluvium will not preclude use of <br /> the alluvial groundwater for livestock watering, although the low well yields in these <br /> areas may already render these aquifers useless for these purposes. <br /> In the Sage Creek Alluvium, the predicted TDS increase immediately below the re <br /> saturated spoil is 99%, but attenuates to 0.1% within 1000 feet. The high hydraulic <br /> conductivities of greater than 1 ft./day measured in the Sage Creek alluvium, in <br /> combination with the large area of alluvial material, provides for a relatively high volume <br /> of flux in the Sage Creek Alluvium. Contributions from tributary alluvium and shallow <br /> bedrock units will provide dilution of the spoil discharge as it mixes with much larger <br /> volumes of groundwater in the Sage Creek Alluvium. The point at which the TDS <br /> increase in the Sage Creek Alluvium is predicted to attenuate to 0.1% is just above a <br /> potentially sub-irrigated field. Therefore, the impacts to the field are predicted to be <br /> negligible. The minimal increase in downgradient TDS levels will also not affect the <br /> suitability of the groundwater for livestock watering uses. <br /> Hydrologic monitoring will continue to be implemented by Seneca Property in order to <br /> verify the predicted impacts. The hydrologic monitoring program is outlined in Tab 15 <br /> of the PAP. <br /> Surface Water <br /> The probable hydrologic consequences of coal mining at the Yoast Mine in regard to <br /> surface water include contributions of sediment to streams from storm runoff, and impacts <br /> to stream water quantity and quality during and after mining. Potentially affected streams <br /> and drainages include Annand Draw, Grassy Creek, and Sage Creek. The most significant <br /> impact of mining on surface water will be the effect of spoil spring discharges from the <br /> reclaimed mine on surface water quality. Seneca Property LLC's predictions of the <br /> magnitude of these impacts is discussed below. <br /> Sediment Loading <br /> All runoff from areas disturbed during the life of mine will pass through one of five <br /> sedimentation ponds prior to leaving the permit area. These ponds are Ponds 010, 011, <br /> 012, 013, and 014 (Pond 011A is upstream and in series with Pond 011). Discharges from <br /> the ponds are required to meet NPDES effluent limits, and should, therefore, not contribute <br /> additional suspended solids to stream flows near the permit area. <br /> Since drainage channel reconstruction and revegetation is complete at the mine, more <br /> runoff from the mine area will occur than during mining, when pits were in place and <br /> maximum disturbance had not yet occurred. However, sediment loads in the increased <br /> runoff should be no larger than those coming from the permit area during mining, which <br /> was treated effectively by the existing sediment ponds. <br /> 18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.