My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2020-08-10_PERMIT FILE - C1981018A (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981018
>
2020-08-10_PERMIT FILE - C1981018A (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/2/2022 11:26:20 AM
Creation date
8/21/2020 10:24:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981018A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
8/10/2020
Section_Exhibit Name
SECTION II.E & II.F Climatology Report & Vegetaton Studies
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
147
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
FRO Resources <br />weather. It is probable that the woodlands have not been used as grazing <br />• areas, due to the low herbaceous cover values measured in woodlands under <br />more natural conditions. However, the herbaceous layer has undoubtedly <br />been decreased by sheep use through animal traffic and associated <br />compaction. Animal traffic, coupled with the natural effects of juniper <br />phenols on the herb layer (Arnold 1964, Jameson 1966), maintain the sparse <br />herb layer. In addition, the damage to the herbaceous material has <br />accelerated erosion by wind and water. Subsequently, the moisture holding <br />capacity and organic content of the surface soil has been reduced. <br />There is apparently no well-developed management strategy in operation on <br />the permit area relevant to maintaining vegetation structure in an <br />integrated fashion with sheep utilization. There is no evidence from <br />range evaluations that sheep numbers have been reduced in accordance with <br />the degradation of the range. Moreover, there is no evidence that <br />programs have been invoked to improve the existing range by stilling <br />erosion or introducing seed into depauperate areas. The lack of positive <br />range management or improvement programs may relate to winter use of the <br />• permit area and the economics of sheep ranching. On such a harsh site it <br />is apparently easier to provide winter food than to improve the range with <br />plant materials whose greatest forage value -- present during spring and <br />summer -- is not used to greatest benefit by domestic grazing animals. <br />• <br />The major impacts to the juniper woodlands potentially caused by mine <br />development will be generated by staging facilities, roadways and by <br />subsidence. The first of these impacts presents the most extensive and <br />long-lasting damage to the woodlands. Areas of the woodlands removed by <br />facilities will not necessarily return to the original type even over long <br />periods of time following successful revegetation of the surface. The <br />soil characteristics of the woodlands will not be replaced by the <br />reclamation efforts currently planned. Soil features are critical to the <br />establishment and maintenance of the juniper woodlands. Without this <br />II.F-27 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.