My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2020-08-18_REVISION - C1981022
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981022
>
2020-08-18_REVISION - C1981022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/6/2021 9:11:10 AM
Creation date
8/18/2020 12:46:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981022
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
8/18/2020
Doc Name Note
Application , Cover Letter & Revised Pages
Doc Name
Application
From
Savage and Savage
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
SL3
Email Name
LDS
JDM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2.2 FIELD SAMPLING <br />2.2.1 Timing <br />Field investigation of the reclaimed areas was undertaken during the period between June 15 <br />and 28, 2020. This time period coincided with anthesis and maximum presence of the majority <br />of plant species found in the reclaimed areas and the extended reference area at the mine and <br />adjacent native areas. <br />2.2.2 Total Vegetation Cover <br />Vegetation cover was estimated by the use of the point -intercept method. An ocular point <br />frame (ESCO Associates) was used to minimize instrument error and maximize precision <br />and observer accuracy. Cover transects were 25 meters in length, with two sample data points <br />collected at 1.0 meter intervals along the transect on opposite sides of the transect centerline, <br />1.5m apart. Transect direction was established randomly through the use of computer <br />generated random directions (0-360°). In no event were transects allowed to extend within ten <br />feet of reclaimed area boundaries to minimize impacts from "edge effect." <br />For statistical purposes, each cover transect (comprising 50 data points) served as a sample <br />unit. Data points recorded the first vertical "hit" on vegetation (above or below the instrument), <br />soil (bare ground), rock, or organic litter. Subsequent "hits" on vegetation (prior to interception <br />of the ground) were also recorded. Cover data were recorded and reported by individual plant <br />species. The first interception was used to calculate total vegetation cover values. Additional <br />interceptions were used to calculate relative cover of individual plant species and lifeforms for <br />the reclaimed areas. The quantitative cover data provided the basis for calculation of species <br />composition and relative importance. <br />2.2.3 Species Composition <br />Species composition information was derived from quantitative vegetation cover data from the <br />reclaimed areas. Relative cover information provided a basis for evaluation of the importance <br />of each encountered plant species and lifeform and for comparison to the applicable final <br />revegetation success criterion. Table 3 presents data summaries for reclaimed area total <br />vegetation cover for each area sampled and contains the relative cover by species and a column <br />depicting the numerical ranking of each species by relative cover for the reclaimed areas. <br />Oxbow Mining, LLC Elk Creek Mine Page 4 <br />2020 Phase 11 Bond Release Vegetation Report <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.