Laserfiche WebLink
outcroppings with a thin gypsite crust that grades thoroughvvaathered gypsum to o0Ud gypsum <br /> rock. Experience has shown that these gypaite crusts vary in thickness fromn 3 inches to 2feet. <br /> The Oypaite crusts generally Contain some silty-clayey material due to the weathering of inter- <br /> bedded clastic sediments. <br /> In summary, the surface in the area can mainly be described as gypsum and weathered gypsum <br /> (0ypsite) outcroppings with intermingled basins of volcanic ash. The gypsum outcroppings <br /> predominate in the area as evidenced by the lack of vegetation in areas other than the <br /> intermingled volcanic ash basins. <br /> Drawing 05 shows the soils map from the NRCS soil resource report for the site /NRCS. 2018\, <br /> along with aerial imagery. <br /> There are no known cave resources in the proposed disturbance area. Should any caves be <br /> discovered in the process of developing the Upper Pit expansion, East Pit, or associated roads. <br /> American Gypsum Would notify the BLK1. <br /> 5.4 Cultural Resources <br /> A Ooas \|| cultural resources survey was conducted in 2001 on 157 acres for Mine features <br /> proposed ai that time. No pnaviousiy-reonodedoiheaorieolotedfindewere noted. The Mine area <br /> was expected to have |mvv potential for cultural resources due to Steep slopes and location <br /> between the 'Flat Tops' Wilderness Pinyon-Juniper woodlands and the Eagle River Valley. <br /> A cultural resources survey was conducted during the summer of 2018 in the proposed Upper Pit <br /> expansion area. A second cultural resources survey was conducted in the summer Of2O1S to <br /> cover gaps /n previous surveys near the existing sediment control ponds previously approved by <br /> CO DRW1S as TFl-00 and TR-07 (CO [)FlMS. 2003; CO DF{K88, 2000). Other areas Of proposed <br /> disturbance have been covered by previous surveys conducted between 1889 and 2017. <br /> According to the eun/eye, the steep landscape is not conducive to archaeological preservation. <br /> No sites have been documented in the area. <br /> 5~5 Paleontology <br /> The main geologic formation in the Mine area, Eagle Valley Evapnhbe, is not included on the <br /> BLM'8 list Of formations in the CRVF{} Planning Area with paleontological resources(BLKV. 2O15). <br /> Included on the list is Basalt of Bimodal Suite (Tbb), which is listed as having @ moderate to <br /> unknown, Orhigh potential to yield fossils. No paleontological resources have been uncovered to <br /> date during mining operations. <br /> 5,6 Vegetation <br /> According tothe BLK8 CRVF[> Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan <br /> (BLM. 2015). the BLK4 lands near the Mine are comprised of pinyon-juniper woodlands and <br /> sagebrush ahrublundm. Previous permit documents note that vegetation cover in undisturbed <br /> areas of the Mine consists mainly of sagebrush and greasewood.Vegetation is sparse on steeper <br /> slopes; some areas include solid gypsum nockOutorOppingS. Like the existing mining area, the <br /> 47 <br />