My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2020-08-03_REVISION - C1981010
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981010
>
2020-08-03_REVISION - C1981010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2020 11:35:09 AM
Creation date
8/3/2020 11:16:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
8/3/2020
Doc Name Note
Response to Adequacy Review No. 5
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response
From
Trapper Mining Inc.
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
PR9
Email Name
RAR
JLE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 12 <br />2018 requested 564 acres of disturbance. Table 3.1-3 indicates 3121.8 <br />acres as projected disturbed acres for the end of the permit term in 2022 <br />taking into account Phase III bond released acres at the end of 2017. This <br />value appears to represent open acres, and reclaimed acres. TMI's table <br />1.4-1 in Appendix A utilizes 1584.6 acres for the PR9 worst case bond. <br />Utilizing TMI's information this value appears to represent a summation of <br />the open acres at the beginning of the permit term, topsoil removal and <br />final regrade. Understanding that table 3.1-3 represents projected acres <br />DRMS is unclear about this basis. DRMS records indicate the disturbed <br />acreage at 3,326.3 and must hold bond for all affected land. Also, TMI's <br />numbers in the PR9 bond calculations do not corroborate the acres <br />submitted in TMI's Annual Reclamation Report and this document may be a <br />more accurate representation of acreages for utilization in bonding <br />calculations. Also, since PR9 has been submitted, a number of TRs and MRs <br />have been submitted changing the affected area and some of those <br />approvals may overlap what was originally proposed with PR9. <br />DRMS Comment 2. Given the approved MR's and TR's since the PR9 application, <br />DRMS would like documentation from TMI demonstrating that the net increase in <br />affected land does not exceed the originally proposed 564 acres. <br />Trapper Response to 2. During the initial submittal of PR -9 a greater acreage was <br />expected to be utilized during the pen -nit term. Following that submittal several revisions <br />to our mine plan and pit orientation have reduced the number of required acres to be <br />disturbed during this permit term. See response to Comment 3 below. <br />DRMS Comment 3. As the worst case bonding scenario should represent the affected land <br />DRMS is approving in the PR9 permitting action, please provide DRMS with acreage <br />representing the net increase in affected area. <br />Trapper Response to 3. After careful review of TR -119, 121 and 124 and the acreages <br />associated with them, a net increase of only 1.4 acres will be required to be added to the <br />affected land acreage for PR -9. As stated above, the needed disturbance acreage for PR - <br />9 has decreased from 564 acres to 454.7 acres. TR -119 requested an increase of 245.4 <br />acres and TR -124 requested an increase of 201.4 acres. Another permitting action, TR - <br />121 was also completed approving the construction of the Johnson Coal Stockpile at a <br />projected 6.5 acres of additional disturbance. These three actions equal 453.3 acres. The <br />two requests of mining related disturbance are the same areas included in the PR -9 <br />application. The Johnson Coal Stockpile has also been taken into consideration on Table <br />3.1.3 and is accounted for in the 454.7 requested acres in PR -9. Therefore, only 1.4 acres <br />remain to be approved for disturbance with the approval of PR -9. <br />DRMS understands that TMI's permit provides for a maximum of 200 <br />development drill holes. However, TMI's bonding proposal bonds for 20 <br />development drill holes. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.