My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2020-07-28_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1980004
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1980004
>
2020-07-28_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1980004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/8/2025 6:27:13 AM
Creation date
7/29/2020 9:16:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980004
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
7/28/2020
Doc Name Note
Case No. 20-12043 (GRH) Hopedale Mining LLC
Doc Name
Bankruptcy Notice
From
E11 USCpiq Corporate Restructuring, LLC
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Email Name
JRS
JDM
GRM
CMM
CCW
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
101
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Case 1:20-bk-12043 Doc 107 Filed 07/27/20 Entered 07/27/20 15:07:21 Desc Main <br /> Document Page 11 of 13 <br /> order, process, or judgment that is necessary or appropriate to carry out the provisions of this <br /> title." 11 U.S.C. § 105(a). <br /> 31. Under applicable case law, in this and other circuits, if a debtor's proposed use of <br /> its assets pursuant to section 363(b) of the Bankruptcy Code represents a reasonable business <br /> judgment on the part of the debtor, such use should be approved. See, e.g., Comm. of Equity Sec. <br /> Holders v. Lionel Corp. (In re Lionel Corp.), 722 F.2d 1063, 1070 (2d Cir. 1983) ("The rule we <br /> adopt requires that a judge determining a §363(b) application expressly find from the evidence <br /> presented before him at the hearing a good business reason to grant such an application."); <br /> Comm. of Asbestos-Related Litigants v. Johns-Manville Corp. (In re Johns-Manville Corp.), 60 <br /> B.R. 612, 616 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1986) ("Where the debtor articulates a reasonable basis for its <br /> business decisions (as distinct from a decision made arbitrarily or capriciously), courts will <br /> generally not entertain objections to the debtor's conduct"). <br /> 32. The retention of Cambio and its professionals is a sound exercise of the Debtors' <br /> business judgment. Mr. Fairfield has extensive experience as a senior officer and as an advisor <br /> for many troubled companies. The Debtors believe that the Engagement Personnel will provide <br /> services that benefit the Debtors' estates and creditors. In light of the foregoing, the Debtors <br /> believe that the retention of Cambio is appropriate and in the best interests of the Debtors and <br /> their estates and creditors. <br /> 33. The retention of interim corporate officers and other temporary employees, <br /> therefore, is proper under section 363 of the Bankruptcy Code. Numerous courts have approved <br /> relief similar to the relief requested in this Application. See, e.g., In re Noranda Aluminum, Inc., <br /> No. 16-10083 (BSS) (Bankr. E.D. Mo. Mar. 17, 2016) [Docket No. 437] (authorizing debtors to <br /> retain advisory firm and designating a chief restructuring officer); In re Patriot Coal Corp., No. <br /> 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.