My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2020-07-24_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1980004
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1980004
>
2020-07-24_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1980004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/8/2025 6:21:48 AM
Creation date
7/27/2020 10:36:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980004
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
7/24/2020
Doc Name Note
Case No. 20-12043 (GRH) Hopedale Mining LLC
Doc Name
Notice of Agenda For Expedited Virtual Hearing on the First Day Motions Scheduled for July 24, 2020
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Email Name
JRS
JDM
GRM
CMM
CCW
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Case 1:20-bk-12043 Doc 3 Filed 07/22/20 Entered 07/22/20 17:38:25 Desc Main <br /> Document Page 33 of 42 <br /> 71. Absent the use of the Cash Collateral, the Debtors will be unable to operate their <br /> businesses as contemplated after the Petition Date and to meet their ongoing obligations. <br /> Approval of interim use of the Cash Collateral thus is crucial, and without such use, the Debtors' <br /> operations, its creditors and other parties in interest will suffer immediate and irreparable harm <br /> and its assets will markedly diminish in value going forward. <br /> 72. In consideration for the post-petition use of the pre-petition collateral, the Debtors <br /> propose to protect the interests of those Cash Collateral Creditors with replacement liens, <br /> superpriority claims, and certain periodic cash payments. <br /> 73. As for the need for post-petition financing, the Debtors have attempted to obtain <br /> post-petition financing proposals from a number of lenders, but were unable to obtain post- <br /> petition financing on an unsecured basis. <br /> 74. Before deciding to obtain post-petition financing from the DIP Lenders, the <br /> Debtors and the DIP Lenders engaged in arm's length, good faith negotiations, each with <br /> separate and independent counsel experienced in matters of finance and bankruptcy law. The <br /> Debtors were unable to obtain proposals for post-petition financing on terms and conditions <br /> more favorable to the Debtors' estates than those set forth in the DIP Term Sheet or the DIP <br /> Orders. <br /> 75. Accordingly, the Debtors have determined, in the exercise of their best and <br /> reasonable business judgment, that the financing to be provided by the DIP Lenders is the most <br /> favorable funding available under the circumstances and addresses the Debtors' immediate <br /> necessary financing needs during these Chapter 11 Cases. The financing available under the DIP <br /> Term Sheet and the DIP Orders will enable the Debtors, among other things, to avoid the <br /> 33 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.