My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2020-07-17_REVISION - C1981010 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981010
>
2020-07-17_REVISION - C1981010 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2021 5:34:57 PM
Creation date
7/20/2020 2:08:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
7/17/2020
Doc Name
Adequacy Review #2
From
DRMS
To
Trapper Mining, Inc.
Type & Sequence
PR9
Email Name
RAR
JLE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Forrest Luke <br /> Page 2 of 7 <br /> July 2020 <br /> 2018 and posed additional questions in February 2019. DRMS received TMI's responses to <br /> both the December 2018 and February 2019 adequacy questions in April 2019. <br /> In December 2019 DRMS and Trapper Mine Inc. met to discuss changes to the Mine Plan <br /> and the requirements of a variance from approximate original contour. On 11 May 2020 <br /> DRMS received TMI's updated mine plan. The following is DRMS's adequacy review of <br /> the updated mine plan and any outstanding issues. <br /> For your review please also find DRMS's cost estimate for PR9 as well as the worst case calculation. <br /> DRMS is happy to work with you on any questions that come up as you consider the attached <br /> estimate. <br /> What follows comprises additional adequacy question resulting from DRMS determination of the <br /> cost estimate associated with the PR9 expansion constituting an add on to the second round of <br /> adequacy questions and delivery of DRMS's cost estimate to TMI at the end of January 2019. <br /> Adequacy issues are numbered in italics below. Rules adequately addressed as a result of <br /> previous reviews are not addressed in this iteration. Additional rules as outlined below are <br /> addressed in this iteration of adequacy <br /> 0 2.06.4—Requirements for Steep Slope Mining <br /> o Requires demonstration of compliance with Rule 4.27.3 <br /> 0 2.06.5 —Variance from AOC for steep slope mining <br /> o Demonstrate compliance with Rule 2.06.5(2) <br /> ■ Requires demonstration of compliance with Rule 4.27.4 <br /> The following rules were adequately addressed in previous reviews: <br /> Rule ADQ Review Rule ADQ Review <br /> 2.03.6 Prelim 2.04.11 Prelim <br /> 2.03.7 Prelim 2.05.2 1 , 2 Prelim <br /> 2.03.8 Prelim 2.05.3 (1), 2a ADQ2 <br /> 2.03.10 May need to check 2.05.3 (13) Prelim <br /> liscenss <br /> 2.04.3 Prelim 2.05.3 4 ADQ2 <br /> 2.04.4 Prelim 2.05.3 5 Prelim <br /> 2.04.5 See ADQ2 2.05.3 6 TR124 <br /> 2.04.6 Stip 2.05.4 M4 and rec pin <br /> 2.04.7 See ADQ2 2.05.5 1 Prelim <br /> 2.04.7 2 Prelim 2.05.5 6 Prelim <br /> 2.04.7 3 Prelim 2.05.6 Prelim <br /> 2.04.9 Prelim 2.06.5 Prelim <br /> 2.04.10 TR124 2.06.9 Hi hwall <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.