My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2020-02-19_PERMIT FILE - C1981008A
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981008
>
2020-02-19_PERMIT FILE - C1981008A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/13/2020 3:10:34 PM
Creation date
7/10/2020 7:54:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
2/19/2020
Doc Name
Protection of the Hydrologic Balance
Section_Exhibit Name
Section 2.05.6(3) Protection of the Hydrologic Balance
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Spoil Water Infiltration into Lowwall <br />Figure 2.05.6(3)-1 shows how infiltration will build up in the spoil downgradient and begin to seep <br />into the lowwall. This spoil water may enter one or more of the minor sandstone beds of the <br />overburden (Dakota Sandstone). This annual infiltration is calculated below, assuming a 10' thick <br />somewhat permeable bed in the lowwall strata: <br />Seepage into Low Wall = (10' ft. thick permeable sandstone bed in low wall)(8500' ft. wide seepage <br />area)(0.10 ft. per day seepage velocity)(1/43,560 cu. ft. to ac. ft.)(365 days per year) = 72 ac. ft per <br />year. <br />The seepage velocity could be as high as 0.3 feet per day, depending upon the sandstone <br />permeability. Using a worst case of 0.3 feet/day, results in a travel of 1000 feet every 10 years. <br />It is strongly believed that spoil water seepage into the lowwall will not have any significant impact <br />on water quality, flow rates, well usage etc. due to four reasons: <br />1) As described in this section, the water quality of the spoil water will be at a maximum 6% to <br />10% higher in TDS than the existing overburden water quality, which is relatively <br />poor. Therefore, regardless of the seepage rates into the sandstone zones, the water <br />quality will be very similar to what has been consistently tested in the overburden, with a <br />TDS from 2800 to 3500 ppm. <br />2) Due to the low seepage rates, the movement is very slow (1000 feet every 10 years). <br />3) The sandstones above the Dakota coals have historically been too poor in quality and too <br />low in flow rates to provide useful wells. For this reason, no known wells in the vicinity of <br />the mine area have been completed in the Dakota sandstone. It is very unlikely that <br />any new wells will be completed in the Dakota sandstone in the vicinity since the <br />Burro Canyon Formation provides significantly better water quality and flow and is <br />located only 50 to 100 feet deeper than the Dakota sands. <br />4) The local wells are completed in the Burro Canyon Formation, which is below the Dakota <br />coals. Although this zone has significantly better quality water, these sandstones are <br />separated from the spoil by shale layers with very low permeabilities, therefore these <br />aquifers cannot be affected by the spoil water. <br />July 2016 (TR -74) 2.05.6(3)-30 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.