Laserfiche WebLink
Streams - Flow <br />This section presents discussions of flow data collected at surface water monitoring sites established at the <br />New Horizon 2 mining area. All historic data (prior to December, 1987) for each site has been compiled <br />and is presented in Attachment 2.04.7-8 (Peabody Appendix 7-5). Please see Map 2.04.7-1 for stream <br />monitoring site locations. <br />Flow variability in Calamity Draw is artificially controlled by irrigation water for most of the year. From <br />about mid-April to mid-October, the West Lateral irrigation ditch (managed by the CCC) is in continuous <br />operation. Exact dates for turning this ditch on and off varies from year to year. Water from the West <br />Lateral is also used primarily for irrigation and secondarily for maintaining water levels in stock ponds and <br />domestic cisterns. Because of the operation of this ditch, the majority of flow in Calamity Draw is irrigation <br />return water. Due to the relatively limited but heavily cultivated and developed watershed area in the upper <br />portion of Calamity Draw, little supplemental flow from precipitation and snowmelt runoff occurs. <br />Surface water monitoring site SW -N101 was established in Calamity Draw above the eastern boundary of <br />the New Horizon 2 Mining Area (see Map 2.04.7-1A). SW -N101 was monitored for flow since July of <br />1986, as part of the baseline monitoring program established for this mining area. Attachment 2.04.7-8 <br />(Peabody Appendix 7-5) contains instantaneous discharge measurement collected at this site since 1986. <br />During the irrigation season, measured discharge ranged from .605 in April up to 13.4 cfs during July. <br />Measured flows during the non -irrigation season ranged between 1.04 and 2.06 cfs. Interestingly, the short <br />record of discharge measurements may suggest that shallow ground water discharge into Calamity from <br />irrigated lands provided a fairly continuous source of baseflow to Calamity Draw during the non -irrigation <br />season. Monitoring of this site was discontinued after the New Horizon 2 Mine became operational. It <br />was replaced by two surface monitoring stations SW -N108 and SW -N109. The upstream station, <br />SW -N108 is located just west of Lincoln Street as it flows from under the road. This station defines water <br />quality and quantity before it enters the area potentially influenced by the mine. SW -N109 is located on <br />Calamity Draw west of the mine permit boundary but east of the Nucla waste water lagoons. As of August of <br />2009, this surface water sample point will no longer be used as the downstream point on Calamity Draw. The <br />downstream sample point will be SW -N 103, a point previously used in pre -mine data gathering by Peabody. <br />This sample point is located southwest of the New Horizon 2 Mine area, and will include all discharge water <br />from the full mine area on the south side. <br />SW -N102 is established on a small tributary of Calamity Draw that returns irrigation tail waters from <br />irrigated fields to the main channel of Calamity Draw. Flow at this site was almost entirely influenced by <br />irrigation, although the limited discharge measurements made since July of 1986 indicated that residual <br />discharge of shallow ground water from the irrigated fields above the site contributed some flow up through <br />even January. During the irrigation period, measured flow ranged from .088 cfs (October) to 2.18 cfs <br />(August). During periods of no irrigation, flow observations made at SW -N102 ranged from zero <br />(February, March and early April) up to .031 cfs (January). <br />SW -N107 was located about a mile and a half below SW -N101 on Calamity Draw. Flow measurements <br />were only periodically collected at this site since July of 1986. A crest -stage gage has been installed at this <br />site for the purpose of recording high water marks of large runoff events (rainfall or spring snowmelt runoff). <br />These high water marks were used to determine the peak discharge of large runoff events using indirect <br />discharge measurement techniques. Since monitoring began (July, 1986), only four events were calculated <br />using indirect techniques: 1) 39 cfs, 11/11/86; 2) 35 cfs, 5/20/87; 3) 34 cfs, 6/22/87; and 4) 96 cfs, 8/27/87. <br />The listed dates represent the respective visit dates that high water marks were measured at the crest gage. <br />Page 2.04.7-19 March 2017 (TR -77) <br />