My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2020-07-09_REVISION - C1981028 (12)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981028
>
2020-07-09_REVISION - C1981028 (12)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/2/2021 2:22:27 PM
Creation date
7/9/2020 11:21:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981028
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
7/9/2020
Type & Sequence
TR47
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Coors Energy Company: Keenesburg Mine <br /> Technical Revision 47 <br /> Modification of Reclamation Success Standards <br /> Sandsage and needlegrass contribute an average of over 70%the relative cover in the last 5 years <br /> (2000-2004) of monitoring with the other three native species contributing another 15% and <br /> cheatgrass contributing 5% (Table 1). <br /> Table 1: Osgood Sand Reference Area Data 2000-2004 (Savage and Savage 2005 <br /> Average Relative Cover(%) <br /> Scientific Name Common Name 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Average <br /> Grass:Annual Introduced <br /> Bromus tectorum cheatgrass 2.1 9.5 1.5 4.8 7.7 5.1 <br /> Grass: Perennial Desirable(Cool) <br /> Nassella viridula green needlegrass 25.1 12.1 12.0 25.5 26.9 20.3 <br /> Other Cool Season Perennial Grass 0.0 1.2 3.8 0.9 1.9 1.5 <br /> Grass: Perennial Desirable(Warm), <br /> Andropogon hallii sand bluestem 10.2 3.5 5.3 2.3 0.0 4.2 <br /> Bouteloua gracilis blue grama 8.1 4.3 15.8 1.1 1.9 6.2 <br /> Calamovilfa longifolia prairie sandreed 5.1 6.3 7.5 2.8 1.2 4.6 <br /> Forbs <br /> Various species 0.4 8.9 8.3 13.0 5.9 7.3 <br /> Shrubs/Succulents:Perennial Native <br /> Artemisia fillifolia 48.9 53.7 45.1 49.6 53.9 50.2 <br /> Other Shrubs/Succulents 0.0 0.6 0.8 0.0 0.6 0.4 <br /> Total Vegetation Cover' 104:0 104.0,1 104.0 104.0 104.0,1 1E14.0 <br /> A majority (84%) of the reclamation areas are mapped by the Natural Resources Conservative <br /> Service (NRCS)within the Deep Sand Ecological Site Description (ESD) with another 13% in <br /> the Rolling Sands ESD (USDA, NRCS 2020). The reference plant community for both these <br /> ESDs is dominated by sand bluestem,prairie sandreed, and switchgrass (Panicum virgatum), <br /> with the Rolling Sands ESD also including little bluestem (Schizachyrium scoparium) and <br /> Indiangrass (Sorghastrum nutans) as dominants, all being native perennial warm season species <br /> (Sprock et al. 2004 and Tecklenburg 2016). The ESDs state that under continuous grazing <br /> without time for recovery, the community is expected to move toward shrubs, short grasses, and <br /> unpalatable species. If this occurs over a long period, the community will transition to the shrub <br /> state dominated by sand sage, annual weedy forbs, and short grasses. <br /> This description suggests that the OSRA community composition was indicative of a native <br /> pasture that was in transition from the at-risk reference state to the shrub state but was not in the <br /> reference state. It was over 50% sand sage with less than 10% of the cover provided by the <br /> dominant reference species. While using data from this site as a model for creating the cover and <br /> production standards was arguably acceptable, using these data as a model for the diversity <br /> standard was inappropriate. The dominance of sand sage and green needlegrass was likely <br /> because these species are less palatable to livestock than most of the other species (USDA, <br /> NRCS 2019). Thus, if the reclamation goal is to establish a community with a diversity of viable <br /> forage opportunities, the OSRA did not meet that goal. <br /> 2 July 2020 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.