Laserfiche WebLink
calculated 2016 cover standard was 44.9%. The results of vegetation monitoring conducted on the <br />bond release area, compared with reverence area monitoring result indicate SPL successfully <br />established vegetation supporting the approved postmining land use. <br />Successful revegetation for the parameter of cover was demonstrated in both 2015 and 2016. <br />Suspended Solids Demonstration <br />The operator submitted pond discharge sample data for all of the ponds receiving discharge from the <br />proposed release area, as well as receiving stream sample data from monitoring points upstream and <br />downstream of the pond outfalls. The pond outfall data indicate that total suspended solids (TSS) <br />contributions do not exceed the limits set forth by the Colorado Department of Public Health and <br />Environment. Monitoring data of the upstream and downstream receiving stream sites indicate that <br />TSS is reduced from the upstream site at the downstream site. <br />The sediment ponds receiving runoff from the proposed release area (Ponds 010, 011, 012, 013, and <br />014) have all been proposed as permanent ponds; the operator demonstrated that the quantity and <br />quality of impounded water were appropriate for their intended use. Final approval is dependent on <br />approval from the Colorado Department of Water Resources where water rights are concerned. <br />In addition to the pond effluent sample data submitted by SPL, the Division requested annual <br />sediment level data from Seneca Property LLC (Table 4), for the ponds receiving run off from the <br />proposed release area. The data show that sediment levels in the ponds have stabilized since <br />revegetation activities began in 2006. None of the ponds have required cleaning since Pond 010 was <br />dredged in 2002 and Pond 011 in 2003. <br />Table 4: Sediment Data Provided by Seneca Coal Company <br />The Division also independently completed a Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) <br />calculation comparing the reclaimed areas to the adjacent unmined areas. The RUSLE calculates <br />expected average annual soil loss per acre of land (rate of erosion), based on slope, rainfall pattern, <br />soil type and vegetation type from the equation A=RKLSCP; where A (average annual soil loss) <br />represents the product of the six variables defined below. <br />The RUSLE is an empirical formula approximating expected sediment yield from a parcel of land. It <br />is reasonable to hypothesize that the RUSLE is useful for discriminating between two significantly <br />different yield rates. However, it is not useful for discriminating between two yield rates of similar <br />magnitude. <br />Permit Number C-1994-082 Page 12 of 23 <br />Sediment Trends <br />Pond Id <br />ac ft gained/lost by year <br />Year <br />2009 <br />2010 <br />2011 <br />2012 <br />2013 <br />2014 <br />2015 atershed area <br />010 <br />00 <br />-0.2 <br />-0.2 <br />0 <br />0.3 <br />-1.4 <br />0 940.4 ac <br />011 <br />00 <br />00 <br />00 <br />0 <br />-0.1 <br />0.1 <br />0 141.3 ac <br />012 <br />00 <br />-0.4 <br />1 -0.1 <br />-0.4 <br />1 -0.1 <br />1 0 <br />1 0 136.8 ac <br />013 <br />0.1 <br />-0.1 <br />0.1 <br />-0.2 <br />-0.2 <br />0 <br />0 34 ac <br />014 <br />3.0 <br />-0.1 <br />0.1 <br />0 <br />0 <br />0.5 <br />0 154.3 ac <br />The Division also independently completed a Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) <br />calculation comparing the reclaimed areas to the adjacent unmined areas. The RUSLE calculates <br />expected average annual soil loss per acre of land (rate of erosion), based on slope, rainfall pattern, <br />soil type and vegetation type from the equation A=RKLSCP; where A (average annual soil loss) <br />represents the product of the six variables defined below. <br />The RUSLE is an empirical formula approximating expected sediment yield from a parcel of land. It <br />is reasonable to hypothesize that the RUSLE is useful for discriminating between two significantly <br />different yield rates. However, it is not useful for discriminating between two yield rates of similar <br />magnitude. <br />Permit Number C-1994-082 Page 12 of 23 <br />