Laserfiche WebLink
y <br /> . On .January 24, 2020, the Division conducted an <br /> aerial inspection of the <br /> site and observed that Operator had continued reclamation <br /> work. Through its aerial <br /> observations,the Division estimated that continued reclamation <br /> work would need to be <br /> done to reduce the reclamation liability at the site sufficient! <br /> for the existing bond to be <br /> sufficient. <br /> . On February 26, 2020, the Division conducted n inspection <br /> action tDivisionpe of the site. <br /> Through the inspection, h determined that reclamation work performed was <br /> sufficient to reduce the amount of necessary financial warranty toapproximately <br /> 4 7'hi <br /> s was insufficient to comply with the corrective action regarding <br /> reclamation in the Board's Ma o 01 <br /> ]� � order. <br /> . Operator did not submit an increase in financial warrantyas required <br /> the May 0'l order if r qu�rd by <br /> ] reclamation work was not performed to ensure the sufficient <br /> of the existing financial warranty. y <br /> . On February 12, 2020, the Division provided notice to <br /> financial warrantor that this rrratt Operator and the <br /> er was set for a hearing at the Board's March 220 <br /> meeting to determine if the financial warranty should be forfeited. <br /> . The Division subsequently provided notice to Operator that <br /> the hearinghad been rescheduled <br /> for the Board's April 2020 meeting. <br /> . On April 20, 2020, the Operator requested an extension of 180 <br /> rn lets further reclamation days t° <br /> complete amation to ensure the sufficiency of the existing financial warrant <br /> and comply with the corrective actin g <br /> rr of the hoard's May� �1 order. <br /> 10. The Division supports the Operator's request to extend <br /> 1 days also � ;the deadline y <br /> y o recommended a modification to the corrective actions and cease and <br /> desist order required from the May 30,2019 Order. <br /> CONCLUSIONS of LAIN <br /> 11. The Board has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to theColorado <br /> Mined Land Reclamation Act p <br /> for the Extraction of Construction !!Materials,Article 3 .5 of <br /> Title 34, C.R.S. (2019). <br /> 12. Under section 34- 2. -11 (3)(a , e.l .s., at a hearing to <br /> a financial warrantyshould b forfeited, consider whether <br /> rfeited,the Board has authority to modify an <br /> determination that the financial warranty is subject y <br /> the t � to forfeiture, settle or compromise <br /> determination,or confirm its determination that a financial arrant should ould be <br /> ORDER <br /> Robinson sons, Inc. <br /> IIM- 076/Robinson sons gavel Pit No. 1 <br /> MV-2019-005 <br /> 2 <br />