My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2020-06-25_REVISION - C1981035 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981035
>
2020-06-25_REVISION - C1981035 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/8/2025 2:37:42 AM
Creation date
6/24/2020 5:11:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981035
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
6/25/2020
Doc Name Note
GCCE King II Mine Dunn Ranch Area LBA
Doc Name
Proposed Revision Materials
From
GCC Energy, LLC
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
PR10
Email Name
JHB
THM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
91
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Table 2.2-11 Construction Equipment List <br /> Source hp Number Daily Total <br /> of Each hours weeks' <br /> Excavator 240 2 10 28 <br /> Front End Loader 541 1 10 28 <br /> Haul Truck 474 2 10 28 <br /> Water Truck 230 1 10 28 <br /> Dozer 450 1 10 28 <br /> Skid Steer 100 1 10 28 <br /> 'All data supplied by GCCE and each work week is assumed to consist of 5 days. <br /> Construction is expected to last 140 days.The EPA's 1999 final report on Estimating Particulate Emissions <br /> from Construction Operations identifies several methods for determining emissions(EPA 1999).Given the <br /> knowledge of the LCC, a Level 2 assessment to calculate emissions was used. The total amount of earth <br /> moved (248,888 cubic yards), Project Area (20 acres) and duration (140 days) are all known. Therefore, <br /> the following PM10 emission factors were applied: 0.011 ton/acre/month plus 0.059 ton/1,000 cy. It was <br /> assumed that only on-site cut and fill is performed. Given the 85 percent control and a 10 percent <br /> PM2.5/PM10 ratio as provided by EPA AP-42,Section 13.2,fugitive construction particulate emissions were <br /> calculated. Table 2.2-12 illustrates that the total emissions associated from the LCC are quite low and <br /> would have minimal impact on the surrounding area. <br /> Table 2.2-12 LCC Summary Emissions (tpy) <br /> Off-road Commuting Paved RoadGeneral Const. <br /> Pollutant Exhaust Exhaust Fugitive Fugitive Dust Total <br /> Dust <br /> CO 2.18 0.19 NA NA 2.4 <br /> NOX 4.60 0.02 NA NA 4.6 <br /> PM10 0.31 0.0003 2.65E-03 2.28 2.6 <br /> PM2.5 0.31 0.0002 6.49E-04 0.23 0.5 <br /> S02 0.01 0.0001 NA NA 0.0 <br /> VOC 0.62 0.003 NA NA 0.6 <br /> CO2 1609.6 20.4 NA NA 1630.0 <br /> CH4 89.86 0.001 NA NA 89.86 <br /> N20 40.99 0.0003 NA NA 40.99 <br /> The indirect emissions would have an impact on the region as all the coal extracted from the mine would <br /> be burned at the various cement plants,which currently operates nearly 100 percent of their fuel on coal <br /> from the King II Mine. <br /> Dunn Ranch Area LBA and Mining Plan Modification 20 <br /> Technical Resources Report <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.