My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2020-06-25_REVISION - C1981035 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981035
>
2020-06-25_REVISION - C1981035 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/8/2025 2:37:42 AM
Creation date
6/24/2020 5:11:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981035
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
6/25/2020
Doc Name Note
GCCE King II Mine Dunn Ranch Area LBA
Doc Name
Proposed Revision Materials
From
GCC Energy, LLC
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
PR10
Email Name
JHB
THM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
91
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
area are depicted in Figure 2.2-1. The closest Oa monitoring is in El Paso County to the north, which is <br /> going to be more highly influenced(if not totally)by the Colorado Springs metropolitan area versus Pueblo <br /> area emissions sources. Air quality within the Project Area and within the vicinity of the indirect sources <br /> is generally considered good, and all identified areas are currently in attainment status for all criteria <br /> pollutants. <br /> As stated above, air quality for any given area is influenced in part by the amount of pollutants released <br /> within and upwind of the area of interest (i.e., emissions loading). The following National Emissions <br /> Inventory(NEI) Data (EPA 2014) presented in Table 2.2-4 shows the amount of pollutants released within <br /> the Project and indirect source areas.Combined with the available monitoring data shown above, readers <br /> can get a sense of the localized atmospheric response to the emissions loading occurring near the ambient <br /> air quality monitors. The NEI data by default includes all the Project and indirect source emissions (as <br /> shown below), as these sources and supporting emissions generating activities have been in existence for <br /> several NEI reporting periods (the NEI is produced every 3 years). Despite this fact, the areas remain in <br /> attainment for all the NAAQS. <br /> 2.2.1.4 Hazardous Air Pollutants <br /> HAPs are those pollutants that are known or suspected to cause cancer or other serious health effects, <br /> such as reproductive effects or birth defects, or adverse environmental effects. CAA Sections 111 and 112 <br /> establish mechanisms for controlling HAPs from stationary sources, and the USEPA is required to control <br /> emissions of 187 HAPs. Ambient air quality standards do not exist for HAPs; however, mass-based <br /> emissions limits and risk-based exposure thresholds have been established as significance criteria to <br /> require maximum achievable control technologies under the USEPA promulgated NESHAP Air Pollutants <br /> for 96 industrial source classes. <br /> Many HAPs originate from stationary sources(e.g.,factories, refineries, power plants)and mobile sources <br /> (e.g., cars,trucks, buses), as well as indoor sources (building materials and cleaning solvents). Most HAPs <br /> emitted from the Project would be the result of vehicle use.The largest components of the HAPs emissions <br /> from these sources are typically various benzene compounds and formaldehyde. The major source <br /> threshold for HAPs is 10 tpy of any one HAP or 25 tpy of aggregate HAPs. Most of the HAPs emitted from <br /> the King II Mine's operations are the result of the on and off-road vehicle use.The largest components of <br /> the HAPs emissions from these sources are typically various benzene compounds and formaldehyde. <br /> Dunn Ranch Area LBA and Mining Plan Modification 9 <br /> Technical Resources Report <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.