My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2020-06-19_ENFORCEMENT - M1978208
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Enforcement
>
Minerals
>
M1978208
>
2020-06-19_ENFORCEMENT - M1978208
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/27/2024 9:05:21 PM
Creation date
6/22/2020 12:06:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1978208
IBM Index Class Name
ENFORCEMENT
Doc Date
6/19/2020
Doc Name
Returned Mail
From
DRMS
To
Elk Creek Sand & Gravel
Email Name
CMM
ECS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
15. Section 34-32.5-124(1), C.R.S. requires compliance with Board orders, <br /> permits, and regulations. By not submitting a complete conversion application and <br /> failing to pay civil penalties, Operator has failed to comply with the conditions of the <br /> Board's July 2019 and February 2020 Orders and is in violation of the Act. <br /> 16. Under section 34-32.5-124(6)(a), C.R.S., if the Board finds that an <br /> operator violated a permit provision, the Board may suspend, modify, or revoke such <br /> permit. By violating provisions of the Act, Operator is in violation of provisions of the <br /> permit, specifically the performance warranty. Suspension, modification, or revocation <br /> of the permit is appropriate. <br /> 17. The Board may find a financial warranty subject to forfeiture where an <br /> Operator failed to cure a default under a performance warranty despite written notice <br /> of the default and ample time to cure such default. §34-32.5-118(1)(b), C.R.S. <br /> (2019). Operator's violation of provisions of the Act and the permit constitute <br /> Operator's default under its performance warranty. Operator defaulted on its <br /> performance warranty, received written notice of the default, and failed to cure such <br /> default. <br /> 18. At a hearing to consider the forfeiture of a financial warranty, the Board <br /> may withdraw or modify the determination that the financial warranty is subject to <br /> forfeiture, settle or compromise the determination, or confirm its decision that the <br /> financial warranty should be forfeited. § 34-32.5-118(3)(a), C.R.S. (2019). <br /> ORDER <br /> Operator did not appear in this matter to present any mitigating factors. There is <br /> no information before the Board indicating that any action other than the requested action <br /> is appropriate. Therefore, based on the foregoing findings of fact and conclusions of law, <br /> and the administrative record,the Board enters the following order: <br /> Based on the foregoing findings of fact and conclusions of law, the Board finds the <br /> Operator in violation of section 34-32.5-124, C.R.S. for failing to comply with the <br /> conditions of the Board's July 2019 and February 2020 Orders. <br /> The Board orders that permit number M-1978-208 is REVOKED. <br /> The Board finds the financial warranty for permit number M-1978-208 is subject <br /> to forfeiture under section 34-32.5-118(1)(b), C.R.S. for Operator's failure to cure a <br /> default under its performance warranty. <br /> The Board CONFIRMS its determination that the financial warranty should be <br /> forfeited. <br /> Elk Creek Sand and Gravel, LLC <br /> M-1978-208 <br /> MV-2019-022 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.