My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2020-06-09_ENFORCEMENT - M1978208
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Enforcement
>
Minerals
>
M1978208
>
2020-06-09_ENFORCEMENT - M1978208
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/2/2020 11:10:18 AM
Creation date
6/16/2020 9:56:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1978208
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
6/9/2020
Doc Name
Board (MLRB) Order
From
DRMS
To
Elk Creeek S&G
Violation No.
MV2019022
Email Name
ECS
MAC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
15. Section 34-32.5-124(1), C.R.S. requires compliance with Board orders, <br />permits, and regulations. By not submitting a complete conversion application and <br />failing to pay civil penalties, Operator has failed to comply with the conditions of the <br />Board's July 2019 and February 2020 Orders and is in violation of the Act. <br />16. Under secfion 34-32.5-124(6)(a), C.R.S., if the Board finds that an <br />operator violated a permit provision, the Board may suspend, modify, or revoke such <br />permit. By violating provisions of the Act, Operator is in violation of provisions of the <br />permit, specifically the performance warranty. Suspension, modification, or revocation <br />of the permit is appropriate. <br />17. The Board may find a financial warranty subject to forfeiture where an <br />Operator failed to cure a default under a performance warranty despite written notice <br />of the default and ample time to cure such default. § 34.32.5-118(1)(b), C.R.S. <br />(2019). Operator's violation of provisions of the Act and the permit constitute <br />Operator's default under its performance warranty. Operator defaulted on its <br />performance warranty, received written notice of the default, and failed to cure such <br />default. <br />18. At a hearing to consider the forfeiture of a financial warranty, the Board <br />may withdraw or modify the determination that the financial warranty is subject to <br />forfeiture, settle or compromise the determination, or confirm its decision that the <br />financial warranty should be forfeited. § 34-32.5-118(3)(a), C.R.S. (2019). <br />ORDER <br />Operator did not appear in this matter to present any mitigating factors. There is <br />no information before the Board indicating that any action other than the requested action <br />is appropriate. Therefore, based on the foregoing findings of fact and conclusions of law, <br />and the administrative record, the Board enters the following order: <br />Based on the foregoing findings of fact and conclusions of law, the Board finds the <br />Operator in violation of section 3432.5-124, C.R.S. for failing to comply with the <br />conditions of the Board's July 2019 and February 2020 Orders. <br />The Board orders that permit number M-1978-208 is REVOKED. <br />The Board finds the financial warranty for permit number M-1978-208 is subject <br />to forfeiture under section 34-32.5-118(1)(b), C.R.S. for Operator's failure to cure a <br />default under its performance warranty. <br />The Board CONFIRMS its determination that the financial warranty should be <br />forfeited. <br />Elk Creek Sand and Gravel, LLC <br />M-1978-208 <br />MV -2019-022 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.