Laserfiche WebLink
Impacts to the Alluvial Valley Floors were addressed in the Probable Hydrologic Consequences section of <br /> the mine permit (Tab 17). Projected TDS concentrations in the receiving streams were estimated from <br /> geochemical models that evaluated potential salt loads from spoil/groundwater interactions.This <br /> information was then used to evaluate the potential impacts to the AVF crops.The impact analysis <br /> projected a 270%(1088 mg/L) increase in TDS within Hubberson Gulch near WSH7 (SW-S2W-SG7) and a <br /> 95% increase (1303 mg/L)within Dry Creek near WSD5 (SW-S2W-SG5).These increases equated to a <br /> final predicted TDS concentration of 1787 mg/L at WSH7 (SW-S2W-SG7) and 2451 mg/L at WSD5 (SW- <br /> S2W-SG5).The projected increase within Sage Creek at WSSF3 (SW-S2W-FG4) was lower at 12%(64 <br /> mg/L) and resulted in a predicted concentration of 676 mg/L.The evaluation concluded that the quality <br /> of the surface water supplying the AVF's would not be impacted to such an extent that the water uses <br /> (irrigation and stock water)would be prohibited or degraded to the point of material damage. <br /> This conclusion is supported by the post mine surface water quality at the sample locations within Dry <br /> Creek watershed. Hubberson Gulch drains through the 26 acres AVF located approximately a quarter <br /> mile southeast of the confluence of Hubberson Gulch and Water Trough Gulch (Section 16 and 21,T5N, <br /> R88W).The fields are flood irrigated with Hubberson Gulch water from just upstream of sample point <br /> WSH7 (SW-S2W-SG7).The average TDS concentration over the last five years at WSH7 (SW-S2W-SG7) is <br /> 1125 mg/L which is approximately 600 mg/L lower than the predicted 1787 mg/L TDS concentration <br /> specified in the Probable Hydrologic Consequences analysis. Lower than predicted TDS concentrations <br /> were also observed further downstream at WSD5 within Dry Creek where the 1710 mg/L five-year TDS <br /> average has been approximately 700 mg/L lower than the predicted 2451 mg/L concentration.These <br /> concentrations are significantly lower than the 3567 mg/L pre-mine TDS concentrations measured lower <br /> in the watershed at the southwest corner of Section 22,Township 6N, Range 88W.This elevated TDS <br /> was attributed to soil salt accumulations from dry land farming in the watershed that are dissolved and <br /> transported to the primary drainages. <br /> The Sage Creek flood irrigated AVF, located in Section 30,T6N, R87W, receives spoil contributions from <br /> both Seneca II-W and Yoast Mine. Although the 970 mg/L five year average TDS concentration measured <br /> at nearby stream point WSSF3 (SW-S2W-FG4) exceeds the predicted TDS concentration of 676 mg/L <br /> included in the Seneca II-W permit it is still approximately 1100 mg/L less than the 2118 mg/L post mine <br /> concentration predicted in the Yoast Mine PHC(see Tab 17 of Permit C-1994-082).The Yoast Mine PHC <br /> concluded that the impact from the increased TDS concentrations in Sage Creek would not have a <br /> significant impact in regard to the potential use of the surface water for flood irrigation.Therefore the <br /> elevated TDS at point WSSF3 relative to the earlier projected post mine concentrations detailed in the <br /> Seneca II-W PHC do not appear to have impacted the AVF. <br /> F.) Agreement of Observed Hydrologic Impacts with the"Probable Hydrologic Consequences" <br /> (PHC) Projected in the Mining Permit <br /> The Observed Hydrologic Impacts are generally in good agreement with the Probable Hydrologic <br /> Consequences projected in the mine permit.The pre-mine groundwater was marginal to unsuitable for <br /> stock and/or irrigation. A single residential well was identified within the mining area and was mitigated <br /> per legal agreement. No other residential wells were located within or adjacent to the mine area. Water <br /> quality at compliance well DCAL-02 meets all applicable water quality standards except for dissolved <br /> iron. As described in Section A above it is likely that the elevated dissolved iron is actually representative <br /> of the ambient background concentrations within the Dry Creek Alluvium and is not indicative of offsite <br />