Laserfiche WebLink
Table 20 includes the analytical results for the spring samples collected from 2015 — 2019. No <br /> Agricultural Use surface water quality standard was exceeded at the Spoil Springs. The Manganese <br /> Agricultural Use Standard in CDPHE Regulation 31 were recently updated to specify that this standard is <br /> only applicable to plants that are grown in areas with acidic soils (<6.0 pH). In alkaline soils, as are found <br /> in the Seneca II-W region, a more appropriate standard would be 10 mg/L (EPA, 1976). None of samples <br /> collected from the spoil springs exhibited manganese above 10 mg/L. There were also no excursions of the <br /> CDPHE Yampa Segment 13d acute or chronic standard for manganese at the spoil springs or at surface <br /> points WSH7 (SW-S2W-SG7), WSHF1 (SW-S2W-FG1), WSD5 (SW-S2W-SG5) downstream of <br /> outfalls 005, 006, and 016. <br /> Sage Creek Segment 13e <br /> There were no excursions of the CDPHE Yampa Segment l3e Sage Creek water quality standards at <br /> downstream monitoring point WSSF3 (SW-S2W-FG4) during the last five years (Table 6). As discussed <br /> above in the Dry Creek Mercury section the lab used by SCC has a method detection limit for mercury <br /> (0.02 ug/L)that is above the 0.01 ug/L aquatic life standard. None of the samples collected during the last <br /> five years exceed the labs method detection limit. The CDPHE performed a reasonable potential analysis <br /> for the Sage Creek NPDES outfalls to exceed the mercury limits during the last NPDES renewal and <br /> determined that there was no reasonable potential for the mines outfalls to exceed the mercury limit. As <br /> discussed in greater detail in the Dry Creek Sulfide section the sulfide detection method used by SSC's lab <br /> exceeds the instream water quality standard. The analytical method used by SCC's lab detects both <br /> dissolved sulfides and acid-soluble metallic sulfides that are present in suspended matter and provides a <br /> single cumulative concentration that includes both the ionized (HS-) and un-ionized forms of hydrogen <br /> sulfide (H2S). The un-ionized hydrogen sulfide is the potentially toxic form that the instream water <br /> quality standard was established for. Calculations of the un-ionized H2S indicate that the alkaline surface <br /> water at this location will not result in un-ionized H2S above the water quality standard when the sulfide <br /> concentrations are less than or equal to 0.02 mg/L. None of the samples collected from the stream points <br /> exceed the 0.02 mg/L concentration. There have also been no excursions of the NPDES discharge limits <br /> during this period at Outfalls 009 and 015 which discharge to Sage Creek. <br /> C. Permit Requirements of the Colorado Department of Public Health &Environment <br /> The six Seneca II West Mine NPDES outfalls located within the Phase-III request area are permitted under <br /> CPDS Permit No. CO-0000221. Outfalls 006, 016, and 017 discharge to unnamed tributaries to the <br /> Hubberson Gulch, Outfall 005 discharges to an unnamed tributary to Dry Creek, and Outfalls 009 and 015 <br /> discharge to unnamed tributaries to Sage Creek. Between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2019 there <br /> was only a single exceedance of the NPDES limits at these six outfalls (Tables 7— 12). Total recoverable <br /> iron exceeded the monthly average limit at Outfall 005 in April 2016. The NPDES permits monthly <br /> average limit is based on the 1 mg/L chronic total recoverable iron table value standard. However, a <br /> temporary modification of the chronic total recoverable iron standard is in place for Dry Creek segment <br /> 13d and was recently extended by the Colorado Water Quality Control Commission until 6/30/2023 (see <br /> CDOH Regulation 33). The temporary modification includes a chronic total recoverable iron standard of <br /> 1.11 mg/L for May — February and a standard of 3.04 mg/L for March — April. Although the Water <br /> Quality Control Division acknowledges that this modification is in place they have been unable to <br /> incorporate it into permit CO-0000221 while the permit is under Administrative Extension. The total <br /> 19 <br />